Humanicsxians of the World Unite For a Better World For All Humanity Across Mother Earth












            The World in Humanics: All-For-One and One-For-All




Ending All of Capitalism's High-Cruelties High-Brutalities and High-Barbarities

Support Regine Humanics Foundation Ltd




Regine Humanics Foundation Ltd: For A Better Human Condition For All Humanity Across Mother Earth
|| Hope Is the Seed Sign and Science of Progress ||











|| The Humanion: Year Zeta: London: Wednesday: March 03: 2021: Humanics: All Humanity As One At Liberty And Equality Across Mother Earth ||

The Humanion Web Map: For All Our Coverage

Contact Epigenomics Editorial   Medicine Humanics Neurology The World Life Elle The Humanion Portable Daily The Humanion Larnaarch
Society Jurisprudence Humanicsonomics Political Philosophy Genetics Ecology Advertise in The Humanion Regine Group of Publications
Sanctum Mayakardium Australasia Asia Africa N America S America Europe Culture The Humanion Team Regine Humanics Foundation
The Distorteddia Humanical Moral Science Humanical Sociology Geo-Politics England The Idearian Join Our Team Humanical Psychology
Humanics Spring Festival 2022: April 06 Humanical Jurisprudence United Kingdom Regine Humanics Lecture 2022: April 06 London Poetry Festival 2021: October 14-15
|| Support The Foundation ||
Humanicsxian Economics

All-For-One and One-For-All


Jessie May Peters

First Published: September 24: 2015
Regine Humanics Foundation Ltd
The Humanion UK Online Daily


As the Mother Earth Belongs to Every Single Human Being of the Humanion Regine Humanics Foundation Ltd and The Humanion Belong to All for We are a Human Enterprise: A Not for Profit Social Enterprise: Support Your Daily Quality Newspaper and Let Us Build an Institution That Will Flow with Time with the Rainbow Peoples of This Earth Far Into the Flowing Future: Support The Humanion: Support Regine Humanics Foundation Ltd







The Humanion Coverage: The General Election 2019 Whenever It Is: December 12

The Political Philosophy, That Says That the Most Vital Part of the Public Affairs Management System, the System of Economics, That Shapes the Market and Directs the Course of Existence of the Entire Range of Business, Trade, Commerce and Financial Endeavours of a Nation and Ultimately Shapes the Human Condition of a Nation Should Not Be in the Ownership of the Entire Nation and Its People as Their State and Government Belong to Them and the Political Economics, That Says That the Survival of the Fittest or Richest Is the Ultimate Aim of Society, in Which the Vast Majority of the Population Must Exist and Perish Away in Serving a Live-in-Life Sentence of Suffering, Agony and Hardship and Must Accept All the High-Cruelties, High-Barbarities and High-Tortures, That Capitalism Creates, Distributes and Enforces are Nothing But a Brutal, Cruel, Ruthless and Inhuman Dictate of a Monstrous Social Jingoistic Jungle, Where Neither Civic Nor Community Can Exist Nor Can There Humanity Exist as Humanity Naturale as Individuals, as Families, as Communities, as Agencies and Organisations and as a Civic Society: And When Such a Monstrous Social Jingoistic Jungle is Established in a Country It Becomes Worse Than a Jungle and It Becomes Every Citizen's Civic and Moral Duty and an Existential Necessity of Humanity to Do All in Their Democratic Power to Eliminate Such Jingoistic Jungle and Replace It with a Civic Society Where Community, People, Families, Individuals and All Humanity are as Real, as Connected and as Active, as Engaged and as Creative as the Human Physiology Is in All Humans of a Given Society: Sunday: July 28: 2019

United Kingdom
England Northern Ireland Scotland Wales

Elaine Phillips: Aspire to Achieve and You Shall

























VII London Poetry Festival 2019
October 14-15: 19:30-22:00


























The Humanion Free Advertisement Supporting Barnardo's Fostering Campaign
Join Debbie Douglas and Lydia Bright in Supporting Barnardo's Fostering Campaign 2019















We find more children are being taken into care with fewer foster carers to look after them as we launch Barnardo’s 10th Annual Fostering Campaign 2019, which are fronted by The Only Way Is Essex Actor Ms Lydia Bright and Ms Debbie Douglas. The fact is this that the number of children in care in England has risen by 27 per cent in the last 10 years, against which we urgently appeal for more people to consider fostering. In the past decade, Barnardo’s foster carers have looked after thousands of children, giving them the best chance to have a happier and positive future.

However, we are concerned that there are not enough suitable foster families to take care of the increasing numbers of vulnerable children in care. Increasing child poverty, a lack of early intervention and support for families before they reach crisis point and a heightened awareness of abuse and neglect are among the complex reasons more and more children and young people are being taken into care. But figures from Ofsted show that the number of approved carers has dropped by 950 in just one year. If, these trends continue it will become, even, more difficult to find good foster placements for vulnerable children. Join In and Support Our Annual Fostering Campaign 2019.




|| January 08: 2019 || ά. The UK Parliament has, today, for the first time in a very long time, united together against the Government behind a major vote: it has declared its position against a No-Deal exiting of UK from the European Union. The parliamentary vote was not directly related to the exit, as the vote was for an all-party amendment to the Finance Bill but the amendment relates to exiting the European Union financing. However, this stance of the Parliament, against a No-Deal exit, has been taking shape for a long time but, finally, the Parliament has risen united in the majority, that declared this stance today: the United Kingdom can not be let to crash out of the European Union without a deal in place. The Humanion sees this act of Parliament today as the first of three most natural acts of the Parliament, that, for the sake of the national interest, people and the country, the sovereign parliament of the country, ought to take at this dangerously perilous time of increasing but entrenched division across the country, people, politics and all other arenas.

With this first act the Parliament has declared that it would not just sit by and watch the Government drag down the country towards this ruinous path, getting the UK crashing out of the European Union with No-Deal. Respecting the Referendum results with the clear and accepted note to go with it: that almost as many people voted to remain, the Government simply can not drag the country out of the European Union without any deal. The people did not vote for that in the European Union Referendum. Neither the leaving side nor the remain voted to accept and give consent to such dangerous departure without No-Deal. The government does not have that mandate from the people of this country. They voted with a slim majority to leave but not to leave in such a dangerous and ruinous fashion with No-Deal nor did the remain voting part of the country voted with consent given to the government to leave the EU with No-Deal. The Government does not have that mandate and it does not have the mandate to waste public funds in the utter waste of so-called No-Deal preparations! Today the Parliament has come together with a majority around a first consensus and acted in support of that stance: a No-Deal is not going to be watched idly by the House of the Nation. A No-Deal is dead and buried today.:::ω.

|| Readmore || 090119 || Up || 









Paddy Ashdown: Served His Country and People to the Very Best of His Abilities at All Times: Like a Giant One That Is One of a Kind



|| December 23: 2018 || ά. Paddy to people, who knew him enough to issue him a nick name or Paddy Ashdown or Lord Ashdown of Norton-sub-Hamdon but none of these says what and who he had been in his giant of a life and existence, which ended yesterday with the last and dignified struggle he had put up against cancer of the bladder and called it a day. In October the country came to hear of this and he is gone few weeks later. Paddy Ashdown was an MP and one among the greatest MPs the House of Commons had ever produced. He was the Leader of the Liberal Democrats, the Leader, who had crafted, constructed and engineered his Party, one, that no one counted for anything to a formidable political force, that no one dared ‘not counting’ any longer. He was the single most and inspirational ‘worker’ of that Party, who could and did inspire a generation of young minds towards liberal values in a society where Conservatism was seen, as, if, it was ‘natural’ politics. His life’s work, resolute, determined and fearless work, commitment and dedication, that built the Liberal Democrats to become this force, this positive force, this formidable force, have no parallel. Paddy Ashdown was one of a kind.

Now, after the more than a decade long-work he had passed the baton to a right and equally talented but younger Leader in the name of late Charles Kennedy, who just took the Party to the height, that no one had imagined anyone could take it. Following his courageous, firm and passionate standing and campaigning against the Iraq war the Liberal Party through the leadership of Kennedy became a truly valid and structured political force, that was poised to contemplate, for the first time, they can, one day, soon, form a government. That was the work of his life, Paddy Ashdown MP’s life’s works on which Charles Kennedy stood with his new army of MPs bursting with faith, energy, belief and unrestfulness. Sad to say that one built it, another grew it much so that another takes it down and tears it apart so that Liberal Democrats are now thrown down to a sad and lonely place. Were they not to lose sight of their vision and remained on the solid, sure and confident grounds of the brightest possible liberal identity, they did not have to go and destroy themselves by joining a bankrupt coalition government with the Conservative Party, they would have been able to go further and beyond what no one could imagine: to be a Party, that could have achieved power, without, even, proportional representation. But that was probably too much of a long wait for many. They could wait no longer. But Paddy Ashdown did not think his job was to waste away in waiting: he stood, he worked, he campaigned and he knew how to reach and inspire the grassroots and he kept at it and truly made liberalism a principled, grounded and righteous place to be: for a liberal society grounded in fairness, open and future-bound in social justice.

Once he had left the leadership position and ceased being an MP he continued working in the country and served many international positions and he was passionate about the work he did in the rebuilding of Bosnia and many other places in the world. Paddy Ashdown was, probably, the last giant of a politician this country has ever produced. He is the best Prime Minister Britain never had. He was principled, vocal and, yet, always, right at the centre of the best argument regardless of what the issue was or the agenda. His articulation ability was second to none. When he spoke regardless of his minority position in parliament or anywhere else and regardless of who the audiences were everyone paid attention.:::ω.

|| Readmore || 241218 || Up || 






Editorial Exiting the European Union: The Final Referendum: Membership of a Club Offers Advantages Benefits and Privileges to Its Members for a Membership Fee and a Commitment That All Members Will Always Abide by Its Rules and Regulations: Under No Circumstance A Member Leaving the Club Can Get a Better Deal with the Club Than Being a Member



|| November 28: 2018 || ά. This is logic. This is simply because the Club exists to offer these advantages, benefits and privileges to all its members; were it to offer a ‘better’ set of these advantages to non-members it disavows its core reason detour: to exist for the membership’s sole benefits. In other words, were the Club to do so, to act against its own members and to offer a better set of benefits to non-members, no one would remain in that Club nor would anyone want to join it, since, who would like to subscribe to be member of this Club and pay a big membership fee only to be offered a worse deal of benefits compared to what are offered to non-members, who do not pay that membership fee nor do they have to abide by the Club’s rules and regulations? In this, the Club has no attractions to attract new members and has all the reasons to lose all existing members and in this it acts against its own existence, which, it can not sustain because it has no means to achieve an income, since, it has lost or, will do, all its members. Furthermore, when such a Club offers a better set of benefits to non-members, who do not pay any membership fee, it does so with the membership’s ‘funds’, which are supposed to be used for the sole benefits of all members. This is the rudimentary, bare and simple truth, that is applicable to this whole sorry saga of the United Kingdom leaving the European Union. However, this truth has been missing from the public discourse ever since the European Referendum.

There have been all these conundrums about negotiating a deal with the European Union since the European Referendum but no one has presented to the country this rudimentary, bare and simple truth that the European Union, as a body of many nations, can not act against its own membership and, must, always, protect the interests of all its members. These two are the ‘determining’ and ‘absolute’ criteria for the Union. These, it can not but follow and, therefore, it can not negotiate a deal, harming its own membership, who pays substantial membership fees every year and are, thus, entitled to the set-out advantages, benefits and privileges. In other words, the European Union’s hands are ‘locked’ by these two determining and absolute criteria, that are non-negotiable. Here, then, United Kingdom goes to negotiate and what does it expect? It took the view that ‘No deal is better than a bad deal’, as the Prime Minister set it out. This statement is an absolute muddle: The Worst Deal is leaving the European Union as opposed to the Best Deal in staying in the European Union. The worse deal, therefore, is leaving the EU with ‘No deal’ and, any other possible deal, is not a bad one but just one bad one picked out of a whole lot of all possible bad deals with the EU for the only deal, that is the best deal, is only available to the EU members. Therefore, to suggest a No Deal is better than a bad one is absolutely wrong. But the UK went into the negotiation with this muddle and what did it expect?

Before we answer this question, let us see, how the UK enters this negotiation. The UK, as a state and government, has the same two determining and absolute criteria: to act protecting and not harming its membership or the people of this country. But this UK state and government were ‘imposed’ a ‘mandatory abandonment’ of these two determining and absolute criteria because the Referendum result, effectively, ‘dictated it’ to them that they can not but follow. And, therefore, the UK goes into the negotiation, having lost its two determining criteria and, thus, not acting to protect and not harm its own interest, which had already been done by the Referendum: it, simply and barely, tries to negotiate a deal from all the inferior positions left outside the membership of the EU and all these inferior deals are made of all possible worse deals for the UK. In this the UK has no true or real choice, which the Referendum result has taken away. This is, possibly, the most worst negotiating position imaginable: doing so not to choose but to get to a state whereby one simply says to oneself: all harm and hurt but this one does so a little easier and a little less for a little less longer than the others with a little less severity than the all others.:::ω.

|| Readmore || 291118 || Up || 





Barriers to Welsh Assembly: Barriers Continue to Prevent Potential Assembly Candidates From Standing



|| July 15: 2018: Cardiff University News || ά. Researchers say that action is needed to encourage a wider range of people from underrepresented groups to enter politics. A team of researchers from Cardiff University’s Wales Governance Centre and London Metropolitan University studied what motivated and discouraged people from considering running for election to the National Assembly of Wales. There is currently a drive to make the Assembly more reflective of those living in Wales.

The work, commissioned by the Assembly’s Remuneration Board, sought opinions from people across Wales, including, those, who had previously stood for election. Taking place over five months, the researchers gathered a wide range of views through surveys, before asking more detailed questions in focus groups and one to one interviews. Results show 78% of those aged 18-24 and 55% of those aged over 65 perceived their age to be a barrier. Only 13% of those aged 45-54 and 15% of those 35-44 thought their age would be a hindrance.

Women were considerably more likely to appreciate incentives and see potential barriers, including, family, safety and workload as more significant. The results showed diversity quotas would make 44% of women more likely to stand. Job sharing was, also, a popular incentive among women, with 68% saying it would make them more likely to stand.

Cost was a significant deterrent for those, who took part in the research. More than 65% of respondents said that the cost of running as a candidate was a barrier they would need assistance to overcome; 20.7% classed it as a significant barrier, which meant that they would not stand. People from underrepresented groups were, particularly, influenced by these issues.

Other factors, that affected people considering standing as a candidate included the complexities of navigating party candidate election procedures and the electoral system. A perceived climate of ‘toxicity’ in politics, also, put people off.

A mentoring system offering shadowing opportunities of Assembly Members and post-election support was the most popular way to encourage potential candidates; 48% said that they’d be more likely to stand with advice from an Assembly Member mentor, with 27.1% stating they’d be much more likely to stand with such a scheme in place. Particular attention should be given to those, who were unsuccessful in being elected, it was found. A mentoring initiative was supported by 83% of women and 68% of people with a disability.

Professor Roger Awan-Scully, political scientist at the Wales Governance Centre said, “This report represents one of the most detailed investigations ever undertaken into why people feel like they can’t stand as a candidate in National Assembly elections.

Anyone involved in the democratic process will recognise the barriers we have identified, which are having a particular effect on groups, who are, already, underrepresented in politics. They are deterring talented people from putting their names forward.’’

The report, Unpacking diversity: Barriers and incentives to standing for election to the National Assembly for Wales, makes 11 recommendations, which include:

Mentoring and shadowing initiatives for potential candidates to learn about the role of an Assembly Member;

Participation in an ‘Open Senedd week’ and candidate roadshows across Wales to bring information about standing as a candidate into communities;

An ‘Access to Politics’ fund, to be considered jointly with the Electoral Commission, Assembly and Welsh Government, enabling candidates with disabilities and those from other under-represented groups to stand in elections;

A new engagement strategy with the public and prospective candidates, including, a re-design of the Remuneration Board’s website to include interactive and accessible content explaining how AMs are supported.

Professor Awan-Scully said, “As we consider major changes to Welsh democracy, such as, the future of the electoral system and the size of the Assembly, these recommendations must be taken on board so that the true diversity of Wales is reflected in our National Assembly.”

Dame Dawn Primarolo, the Chair of the Remuneration Board, said, “The Board welcomes the report and is grateful to the authors for undertaking the research on its behalf. The findings have identified several barriers, that potential candidates, may, face as they consider whether they wish to stand for election to the National Assembly.

The Board will consider the recommendations of the report in due course and we will, also, seek to work with other organisations in tackling those issues, that are highlighted, that are not within our remit. By working together to support individuals from as wide a range of backgrounds as possible to stand for election to the Assembly this will only strengthen the institution’s ability to deliver for the people and communities of Wales.”

Read the Report:::ω.

|| Readmore || ‽: 160718 || Up || 









United Kingdom The British Medical Association Annual Conference 2018 Told: The Foundation of General Practice Is at Risk of Collapse But Can Be Rebuilt
|| June 26: 2018 || ά. The UK GP Leader has told the country’s doctors that the foundation of general practice on which the NHS depends has ‘serious structural faults’ but that he is committed to rebuilding it to ensure the future of the health service. Speaking to the British Medical Association:BMA members at its Annual Conference 2018, taking place in Brighton, Dr Richard Vautrey, the BMA GP Committee UK Chair, highlighted the invaluable footing, that primary care provides for the health service, but said that that was at risk as GPs report unmanageable workload pressures, hundreds of practices close and doctors leave the profession.

Delivering his speech at the Brighton Centre, Dr Vautrey said, For 70 years, general practice has been the foundation on which the NHS has been built. For 70 years general practice is where the vast majority of patient contacts have occurred, where, generation after generation, have been looked after by GPs and their teams, embedded within their community, providing care, even, before the cradle and, often, after the grave to those left behind, grieving the loss of loved ones. It’s been on this foundation of general practice and the primary care we provide, that other NHS services have depended.

Dr Vautrey went onto saying, We’ve managed demand, enabled efficient working elsewhere in the system, directed patients to the right specialist service, been innovative in care pathway design and, above all, managed clinical risk on behalf of the NHS as a whole. But when nearly 40 per cent of GPs intend to quit direct patient care in the next five years and over 90 per cent of GPs are reporting considerable or high workload pressures, we know that the foundation of general practice has serious structural faults.


Life's Laurel Is You In One-Line-Poetry A Heaven-Bound Propagated Ray Of Light Off The Eye Of The Book Of Life: Love For You Are Only Once



Life: You Are The Law The Flow The Glow: In Joys In Hurts You Are The Vine-Songs On The Light-Trellis



























Subscribe to The Humanion Portable Daily For Just £100 a Year

Newspapers Press and Media Are Either Progressive or Regressive in the Sphere of Public Discourse: Readers Choose Which to Support
The Humanion Portable Daily Belongs to the Progressive Path: Read and Support Building the Voice of the Dispossessed for Change







                                                      Read The Humanion Portable Daily

















|| All copyrights @ The Humanion: London: England: United Kingdom || Contact: The Humanion: editor at || Regine Humanics Foundation Ltd: reginehumanics at || Editor-In-Chief: Munayem Mayenin || First Published: September 24: 2015 ||
|| Regine Humanics Foundation Ltd: A Human Enterprise: Registered as a Not For Profit Social Enterprise in England and Wales: Company No: 11346648 ||