Regine Humanics Foundation Ltd: For A Better Human Condition For All Humanity Across Mother Earth
The Arkive
|| Year Delta: London: Saturday: January 19: 2019: We Keep On Walking On The Path of Humanics ||
Editorial Page Epigenomics Beauroblubellogenics Astrophysics Palaeontology Jurisprudence Psychology The Earth The Moon The Sunnara The Humanion Team
The Elleesium The Humanion Hearteogenics Archaeology Anthropology Geology Molecular Biology Marine World Microbial World Universana GREEN-K Hope
Elsinki The Universe Cosmology Astronomy Matter World Seismology Theatre The Arctic The Antarctic The Milky Way The Humanion Web Map

I Humanics Spring Festival 2019: April 06 in London

I Regine Humanics Annual Lecture 2019: Whither to Homo Sapiens: Delivered by Dr J Everet Green: April 06 in London

VII London Poetry Festival 2019: St Matthews at Elephant and Castle: Meadow Row: London SE1 6RG: October 14-15

Classified Adverts Holidays and Attractions Adverts Events and Festivals Adverts Employments and Opportunities Adverts Public Service Adverts Products and Services Adverts
|| Subscribe to The Humanion || Make a Contribution || Buy The Long Walk to Humanics || Join The Regineumanics Family || To Support The Foundation ||

Regine Humanics Foundation Ltd Publishes The Humanion among doing other things: We do not and shall not accept fundings or contributions from any type, form, manner and layer of Governments of national, international, supra-national or any other type or bodies formed by them nor from rich individuals or bodies or agencies of any kind. This, to us, is as a matter of absolute philosophic principle to ensure our resolute and complete independence. The ways, in which, we invite support from the readers, members of the public and all other individuals and agencies and businesses of any kind, are: a: Voluntary Subscription Payments: b: Voluntary Contributions: c: The Minimal and Symbolic Membership Fees to Our Regineumanics Family: d: Buying a Copy of The Long Walk to Humanics: e: Contributing to Our Events and f: Advertisement in The Humanion. We say it here and invite you for your support and we do not keep asking you on every page your visit to read the materials. You make a conscious, wilful and philosophic choice to Support The Humanion and The Foundation. If, you do: thank you: If, you do not, thank you, too, for reading The Humanion. The world has, apparently, accepted that Capitalism is the High Pinnacle of All Systems and, some still dream that Marxism will rescue humanity from this Killing Mechanism Capitalism, we refuse to subscribe to that and Humanics is the Post-Marxist and Post-Capitalistic World View of What Humanity can be and what it can do and how infinitely better a human condition can be created in a Humanical Society, by eradicating ownership and money and by establishing belongingship in human enterprise, setting all humans at liberty and equality under the rule of law in natural justice with a direct form of democracy, humanics calls it, Humanicsovics, in which, each human soul is her:his own High Representative. In this, Humanics is the Minority Vision and, in this, we do not and can not expect millions and billions of people supporting our vision today but We Whole-Heartedly Believe That ONE DAY This Humanity Shall BE ALL HUMANICAL: By When: We Know Not But This: That Being a Monstrous Killing Mechanism Capitalism IS Unsustainable: But the World Shall Change One Day and Every Change Begins with an Idea, with a Vision: We invite you to Envision the Vision of Humanics and Support The Humanion and The Foundation to Keep Taking Forward the Vision of Humanics for an Infinitely Better Humanity in an Infinitely Better Human Condition for All Humanity Across Mother Earth. Thank You.

First Published: September 24: 2015
The Humanion



The Humanion UK Online Daily













The Humanion Editorial

The Humanion Editorial Arkive Year Beta

The Humanion Editorial Arkive Year Alpha





As the Mother Earth Belongs to Every Single Human Being of the Humanion Regine Humanics Foundation Ltd and The Humanion Belong to All for We are a Human Enterprise: A Not for Profit Social Enterprise: Support Your Daily Quality Newspaper and Let Us Build an Institution That Will Flow with Time with the Rainbow Peoples of This Earth Far Into the Flowing Future: Support The Humanion: Support Regine Humanics Foundation



Against the Deal: 432: For the Deal: 202: This Shatters the Government and the Prime Minister’s Standing Authority and Credibility Absolutely Terminally and Marks in History as Being the Highest No Confidence Expressed Against Any Historic British Government Except It Does Not Say That It Was a Vote of No Confidence Because It Was a Vote Against the Deal


















|| January 15: 2019 || ά. Against the Deal: 432: For the Deal: 202: All dramatics and theatrics with their high intrigue and conspiratorial under and over tones were played out and all actors took active parts inside and around the corridors of the Houses of Parliament as the Government ducked and dived and delayed and dithered and stitched and botched and, then, eventually, came back with the same doomed deal, that would face the same fate, earlier or later, to the Parliament and it got a crushing end, rejected by the Parliament with an unprecedented majority: by 230 votes. And the question whether delaying the vote and wasting precious weeks in that process helped the Government? The answer is obvious and the fact is not just that the deal was undone but that the Labour Party Leader Mr Jeremy Corbyn’s Motion of No Confidence in the Government, tabled immediately after the defeat of the Government deal, which should be debated and voted on later today, is poised to undo the Government itself, were a few of the Conservative MPs joined the opposition in support of the motion, which is not very likely to succeed but not impossible to do. Even, if, the motion fails, the fact that a majority of 432 MPs voted against the Government deal shatters the Government and the Prime Minister’s standing, authority and credibility absolutely terminally and marks in history as being the highest No Confidence expressed against any historic British Government, except, it does not say that it was a Vote of No Confidence but vote against the deal.

We have already said in our earlier editorial that the Parliament has begun a three-act asserting itself, out of which, it has done two acts with today’s rejection of the deal: the third and final act should follow with this No Confidence Motion whereby the Parliament, despite and regardless of the outcome of this vital motion, unite and declare a no deal exit dead, delay the Article 50 deadline and direct the Government to go back to the people either for a General Election or a Final Say. And:or, simply, declare ownership of the entire exiting the EU and take absolute and full control of the process and agree a way forward. The talk of Parliamentary sovereignty and people’s sovereignty is misguided: neither is sovereign on their own, primarily, simply, because Parliament is sovereign so long it relates to the people and exercises that sovereignty on behalf of the people and people are sovereign so long they have a sovereign Parliament, that can and does exercise that sovereignty for and on behalf of them because otherwise, people, as they are, they are an unorganised body made of millions of individuals, who have no other means, unlike the parliament, to gather together and express a voice other than at elections and referenda. In this, the disarray and disunity in the Parliament is blamed on the MPs and the politicians but this, again, is misguided, since, the country has voted in such a way that half the people with a little more voted to leave and half the people with little few voted to remain. And, in this, two entities of the UK, i.e, Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to remain and England and Wales voted to leave. This duality of stance among both the people and the entities has been expressed by the MPs elected so that many MPs are elected by areas voted to leave and many MPs are, likewise, elected by areas voted to remain and these MPs of both groups are seeking to serve their constituents’ stance. However, what is complicated is this that many MPs are seeking to find a position, that makes the least possible difficulties, minimises the damage and serves the long-term interests of the country and their constituents.

This is unprecedented, since, this issue has, like the country and the people, divided all the political parties and loyalties, as well as, the Parliament. And the Conservative Government has made a mess all the way and they sought to place and placate the Parliament, as, if, it is a House of bad guys, determined to ‘thwart’ the government. Now that Parliament has come to full-throttle life and is seeking to assert itself this offers the people to really see their sovereignty is being claimed by this very House. Whatever people, might, say or feel about MPs making a mess but it is not the MPs, who have made the mess but this Government while these very MPs of this very Parliament, this very House are now determined to stop the Government taking the country towards whatever hard or high wall or tall cliff they liked to. Some people are saying this is a constitutional crisis but it is nothing of this sort; in fact, we believe, the British House of Commons, is writing the most golden chapter of its history now where it is creating new precedents, new ways of working and keeping the Government under scrutiny and rejecting the dictate that says: the Government of the Day dictate and control the proceedings of the House. The Parliament is writing new golden rules, by which it no longer will be cowed to the Government control and will and can decide which laws and, when, should take priority and pass them accordingly. It does not have to wait for the Government of the Day to ‘allow’ it time or not. MPs in an organised House with the highest concentration and command of the power are the best guarantee that the people have their sovereignty because without this House in such condition people do not have any sovereignty because they are not an organised body but all are in a spread out un-organised millions of individuals.

This Government, regardless of whether it survived this Confidence Motion, is, effectively and politically, dead, except no one has it in them to go through the process of dragging it out of office. In such a state a UK Government should never have been brought to; which it has been, simply, because the Conservatives do not want to change their leader for no one wants to lead this party now for no one wants to lead it into oblivion in a new election, which they will do everything in their power not to go. For what they have done over these horrendous years, including, this mess of the exiting the European Union fiasco, that was entirely of their own making, are now bearing fruits in the desperations spread across the spectrum of society and it is harvest time for austerity, cuts and devastations, inflicted on the fabrics and cohesion of families, communities and society and the very poor of all kinds, working or otherwise, everywhere. A General Election is a must for a politically dead Government can not go on for long and the European Union will, simply, take the view that a Government, that loses its most vital legislation by 230 votes is, utterly, unsustainable and negotiating with it is a waste of an investment of EU resources, since, how does one take the view that this very Government is going to succeed with a new deal it negotiates when it lost the first one by 432 majority? In addition to this, Mrs Theresa May has dug herself in this deal, that now is in the dustbin and she rejected all other options, a lot of which were supported by the opposition parties and, therefore, it is highly unlikely that she will now suddenly change her position and widen scope of negotiation for a new deal, that, might be, acceptable by the majority of the Parliament and, for her, even, if, she changes her minds and goes for this newer areas, she still have half her Party determined to stop her every step of the way. The only way she can serve the national interest is, if, she realises and accepts that she has walked the entire length of her carpet and the road and both have run out and nowhere else she now could turn or go and humbly and with honour call it a day. And call a General Election or offer a New Final Say Referendum for the people to decide on this conundrum of exiting the EU once and for all.  

But for the sake of the country and the nation the hope resides with the Parliament and the focus, must be, the paralysis of the Government and how that created a mountain of problems, most difficulties and desperate and urgent challenges, that are devastating the economy, communities, families, society and every sphere of life. A new government is a must, that will have a fresh mandate and that will deliver and re-start the business of governing and open everything back up again. With it a resolution of this exiting the European Union is to be found. The economy, trade, business and commerce must re-commence and go on working out of this state of limbo of uncertainty and this going round and round the same dead mulberry bush every day for almost two years and houses needs to be built, public infrastructures and public and civic services need to be rebuilt and invested on, education needs to be invested, the police, the social services, the youth services and all other services, local government, legal aid and much much more, all these are things, that can not wait. The economy needs to be put back into a natural working order so that the haze and hazardous state, that has paralysed most of the sectors through the debacle of the exit. The country is gasping for air. People are dying on the street. The fallen apart social care is causing immense suffering and many elderly and vulnerable people are paying the price. Foodbanks and growing level of poverty and hunger and disconnections and the falling apart of the realities in the high streets are all the more urgent issues, that require urgent attention and vital investments and, most importantly, these can not wait for another minute. Time it is that this episode wake the country up to see exiting the EU is vital but there are far more vital and necessary things, that must be done and none of which can wait for a dead Government to find it in itself and wake up so to realise it must leave the office. However, the country and the nation should register and celebrate the fact that after all these centuries of development, building up and forward, the British House of Parliament has reached the full height of its ability and is now writing the golden chapter in its history today, that will keep on strengthening British democracy and lead it towards making it updated and suitable for the millennia ahead and, probably, this is the best possible thing to come out of this whole sorry saga of Leaving the European Union and the country ought to celebrate this true power of the sovereignty of the people, held and kept and exercised by this very people’s elected House.:::ω.

||  || 160119 || Up || 












The United Kingdom Parliament Has Found Its Will and Asserted It Today: The Three Acts of the Parliament That Can Get the Country Out of the Nightmarish Groundhog Day Since the European Union Referendum: Act One Done Today: Act Two to Be Done Within a Week to Reject the Government’s Current Deal: The Third and Final Act: To Redirect the Government to Go Back to the People



















|| January 08: 2019 || ά. The UK Parliament has, today, for the first time in a very long time, united together against the Government behind a major vote: it has declared its position against a No-Deal exiting of UK from the European Union. The parliamentary vote was not directly related to the exit, as the vote was for an all-party amendment to the Finance Bill but the amendment relates to exiting the European Union financing. However, this stance of the Parliament, against a No-Deal exit, has been taking shape for a long time but, finally, the Parliament has risen united in the majority, that declared this stance today: the United Kingdom can not be let to crash out of the European Union without a deal in place. The Humanion sees this act of Parliament today as the first of three most natural acts of the Parliament, that, for the sake of the national interest, people and the country, the sovereign parliament of the country, ought to take at this dangerously perilous time of increasing but entrenched division across the country, people, politics and all other arenas.

With this first act the Parliament has declared that it would not just sit by and watch the Government drag down the country towards this ruinous path, getting the UK crashing out of the European Union with No-Deal. Respecting the Referendum results with the clear and accepted note to go with it: that almost as many people voted to remain, the Government simply can not drag the country out of the European Union without any deal. The people did not vote for that in the European Union Referendum. Neither the leaving side nor the remain voted to accept and give consent to such dangerous departure without No-Deal. The government does not have that mandate from the people of this country. They voted with a slim majority to leave but not to leave in such a dangerous and ruinous fashion with No-Deal nor did the remain voting part of the country voted with consent given to the government to leave the EU with No-Deal. The Government does not have that mandate and it does not have the mandate to waste public funds in the utter waste of so-called No-Deal preparations! Today the Parliament has come together with a majority around a first consensus and acted in support of that stance: a No-Deal is not going to be watched idly by the House of the Nation. A No-Deal is dead and buried today.

But this act is part of a three-act series in which the country and the nation expect the sovereign Parliament of the United Kingdom will act to safeguard the national interest and protect the livelihoods, economic and employment prospect, as well as, the longstanding position of the country in the world. The second act of Parliament should be to reject the current deal, that the Government is so scared to present to the Parliament to be voted on, outright: throw it in the dustbin. This is almost certain for the Parliament to do next week as and when the Government brings the deal back to the House to be voted on. This way the Parliament can put two dead-deal into the bin: the current deal to leave with and the No-Deal. Having done these two acts the Parliament must come together once again and this time, not with a negation but with positive action, instruct the government to do two things immediately: a: inform the EU that the Article 50 Process is put be on hold sine die while the UK resolves the issues internally and, b: that the Government goes back to the people immediately: with three choices placed before them: a: leave the EU with a deal; b: remain in the EU and, c: In case of leaving with a deal the deal must be approved by the Parliament.

The Parliament has acted today with the national interest: but this is the first act of asserting the will of this sovereign body and the next one, the second act, is almost certain for it do. We call on all MPs of the House of Commons, the country and the people have been going round and round in a groundhog day since the European Union Referendum, it is time to put away the ‘trenches’ and get ‘undugged’ and united against what is the most vital national interest and assert the will of this Parliament. You have shown today it is possible and doable. Otherwise, this leaving the European Union will have done irreparable, unparallel and continual damage, devastation and ruin for the country and its people for generations to come and, in such a horrible future, were it to be let to come true, this Parliament will be held to account by history as being such a Parliament, that had failed to do its duty: to remain sovereign and serve the people and the country in keeping the government of the day accountable and in which it had failed. But today the Parliament has shown it is incapable of failing in this vital task: next week, let the Parliament show it is equally capable of asserting its will and reject this terrible current deal and following this second act, let it set out its third act: to redirect this country towards a resolution of the European Question and create a pathway for the United Kingdom to get out of this nightmarish Groundhog Day.:::ω.

|| Readmore || 090119 || Up || 










Baangladesh: An Emerging and Growing Democracy to Which the World Must Show Patience and Offer Support for Building and Strengthening a Democratic Culture Democratic Institutions Separation of Powers Under the Due Process of Law Requires Continual Works for Centuries: Baangladesh’s Democracy Effectively Began Only in the 90s





|| January 06: 2019 || ά. If, there exists not secularism as the sole-form of identity of all its people in a democratic, rule-based political and public governance system and an economy, that is, in essence, a social democratic economy in an open and world-facing society, there can not exist a Baangladesh, that can claim it continues to uphold the legacy of its Independence War and the aspirations by which it declared independence, fought and achieved it, through which the country became a liberated and independent nation in 1971. Because, unlike, almost, any other nationalism in existence in the world and, which is unique in Asia, particularly, in south east Asia, the very idea of Baangladesh was born in defence of its language, Baangla, that began almost as soon Pakistan came into existence and Poorbo Baangla or East Baangla found itself being part of it as East Pakistan and began experiencing West Pakistani dominance, which increasingly began to become colonial, seeking to dictate and dominate it and its primary attack was directed to the Baangla langue or Baangla Bhaasha and Baangali culture, arts, literature, music and all medium of the press, which soon came to a defining point on 21st of February 1952 in which the entire Poorbo Baangla, led by the student communities, stood against the Pakistani imposition that ‘Urdu and Urdu shall be the state language of Pakistan’, while Poorbo Baanlga commanded the largest proportion of the whole of Pakistani population. That was the day, that was the year in which a secular Baangladesh with a secular identity was born politically but, culturally, sociologically, anthropologically Baangla had been a secular land, Baangalis had been a secular people and they practised and existed in secular ways of existence for thousands of years.

Therefore, no one can claim a Baangladesh, that is still so without being a secular land, housing a secular people, with a state, that minds its own business and does not favour nor disfavour any religious identity but offers all equal protection under the law. In essence, out of the entire South Asian Sub-continent Baangladesh alone had developed against and away from religious line of politics but that took shape after religious politics with the utter and absolute failure in the part of the British colonial rulers to envision the devastating and deadly consequences to agreeing to partition India the way they agreed to do: in religious line and in that Pakistan took the Muslim League line and fell into the dogmatic but politically imposed Islam, concocted, brewed and directed by the founders of Pakistan, than, based in West Pakistan. The irony was this and it was failed to be noticed by the colonial British rulers that there were 1,100 miles of India between West Pakistan and Poorbo Baangla or what was to be East Pakistan, the two geological places on earth, that had been concocted together to be one country! And along this ‘poker of blind practice of political games’ many a land and many a people of the South Asian Sub-continent got pencilled half into India and half into Pakistan! The whole Baangla was the victim of that so that the west of it went into India and the East went into Pakistan to be one with West Pakistan with which it had no connecting border but 1,100 miles of India!

Therefore, there were two forces in Poorbo Baangla: one secular, since 1952, aspiring towards Baangla nationalism and towards an independent Baangladesh and the others all reactionary, obnoxious and dangerous Islamic fundamentalist forces, who wanted nothing but the physical and metaphorical annihilation of anything secular. These reactionary and religious fundamentalist and violent extremist groups, who used violence, intimidation and all other means to gain advantage. If, the world wants to really know where the so called ‘Daesh’ barbarity come from’ it has got to learn about these obnoxious forces at work in both parts of Pakistan during its existence. Now, these forces were part of the West Pakistani ruling elite and those, who were not, were their ardent and violent supporters. As time went on and politics went on advancing secular forces, initially, mostly, led by the rising and aware student communities but soon by the progressive forces, including, what now has become known as Awami League along with a growing list of left leaning socialist groups.

Eventually, during the war, when the country could not but choose side, the vast majority of the Poorbo Baangla supported the Baangladeshi Liberation War and the other side, the religious obnoxious fundamentalist extremists went on all-out war against the population. These forces were the lapdogs of the West Pakistani Government and they undertook all forms and manners of violence and violations of human rights, including, gang rape, gang-abduction of girls and women to supply the Pakistani army and other military forces in cantonments and barracks and other military installations, they went and burnt people’s houses, they torch down houses of warships of all faiths, they abducted young men and women and killed them and buried them in unknown graves, they went about making a black list for the people to be killed and they, even, established many paramilitary groups to fight along with the Pakistani armed forces. They went about looting and taking possessions of lands and properties of minority communities, both religious minority and all others and began to use these looted properties as their own. Finally, just two days before the day Baangladesh were to be liberated they followed their death list in which they listed all the intellectuals they determined to be killed and on one night, the December 14, they kidnapped and killed thousands and thousands of these intellectuals, most of whose whereabouts are still unknown. But, at the end, they failed to stop Baangladesh becoming a free and independent country and they lost the war but they never accepted the very existence of Baangladesh. They still dreamed that they would be able to take the clock back and bring Pakistan back into existence.

However, they faced a tougher reality once Baangladesh came to existence and it was time for them to face the music of the deadly monstrosities they had committed against the very people of Baangladesh. But this did not last long as very many forces conspired and came together to create the conditions for Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and almost entire of his family to be assassinated so that a long line of corrupt and corrupting generals and other arrangements, that ‘legalised’ the generals to become politicians. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman’s biggest mistake was that he had failed to set up a national unity government bringing in all the forces supporting Baangladesh and, then, further he went about bringing in one party system and all the suppressions and oppressions, that followed from it, including, banning all political parties, media outlets and, along with it, extra-judicial became ‘natural judiciary’ so that overnight his entire base had erased away so that those wanted to finish him off could dare doing so. Once he was assassinated his party simply vanished. It existed not officially for a long time. This current Awami League came about, many many years later, as, if, it was a true re-incarnation. In this re-incarnation Awami League did not begin where Sheikh Mujibur Rahman had left off: they did not begin the one Party he had set up; rather they re-created the Awami League with which he led the people and the land to become free. This Awami League is currently in power.

This period of generals ruling and devastating the country lasted between 1975 and 1990. In short, these generals did not have any support and as time went on they faced stronger oppositions as all opposition forces began to gather together and fought against them. In this the more resistance they faced the more they needed support from some places: they always had had support from the outer world. But they needed the support from within and they went and brought out the obnoxious Islamic religious extremist forces, that were banned and now they began to be rehabilitated. When, these generals formed political parties, these forces provided the main leadership of these generals’ parties and, eventually, the Baangladesh Nationalist Party:BNP, formed by late General Ziur Rahman became an umbrella for all these obnoxious forces and under his reign these religious political parties, who still did not accept Baangaldesh, were let to become active and they were actively supported by the state. These forces further received an almost endless flow of funding from very many middle eastern countries and soon they began to organise their own illegal but tolerated and, ignored by the state, paramilitary forces, that they housed in college and university campuses and these forces went on a rampage and violent war against the selected progressive forces, particularly, student leaders across the country. Their brutal, ferocious, barbaric and merciless way of slaughtering and killing their opponents will make Daesh atrocities look tame. These happened throughout this period between 1975 and 1990. Furthermore, these violent Islamic groups used their foreign funding to pay their armed cadres and party workers regular salaries and for students they paid their tuition fees and housing and other costs so that they ‘bought in’ young men to join their party because of the lucrative ‘salary’ and other facilities, such as, motorbikes, bikes, cars and other accessories, regular salaries and holidays and loans etc. In addition to this, these obnoxious violent groups used the same foreign funding and channelled enormous amount of money into private businesses, such as, publishing newspapers, establishing medical and health clinics and private hospitals and an endless opening and funding of so-called Madrassas or Islamic schools and private nurseries, primary schools and secondary schools with which they went about brain washing young minds. But all these created for them the position so to become almost like an employment agency so that all their workers, who needed to work, find their parties had a ‘job factory’! This is how they were let to devastate the grassroots of entire Baangladesh. All that went on in direct support of these generals.

And this way they grew in strength and they advanced that new found strength of the armed muscles when they took a ‘tactical’ position and opposed the General Ershad regime, against whom all the political parties were formed in two alliances. There were two major alliances: one led by Baangladesh Nationalist Party:BNP and the other, led by, Awami League, which commanded a 15-Party Alliance, the largest one. These religious parties were not taken in these alliances so they maintained their independent stand and followed the opposition programme through which they advanced politically. In this Baangladesh Nationalist Party worked with them quite a supporting manner with a tactical but silent and unwritten pact.

Then, came the fall of General Ershad. There came a Caretaker Government, which held a General Election in 1991 at which these forces found their dividend payment and they did very well and Baangladesh Nationalist Party, led by Mrs Khaleda Zia formed the Government, which she led until the Party lost the office in 1996 election at which Awami League, led by Mrs Sheikh Hasina Wazed, the one of the only two surviving daughters of late Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. But in 2001 election BNP came back to power again and ran Baangladesh until 2006, when there followed a caretaker government from 2006-08. At 2008 election Awami League came back to power, when BNP had only achieved 29 MPs in the House. That is almost a political wipe out for a Party, that was in government twice!

Then 2014 election Awami League won again, which BNP boycotted so that in the last Parliament elected in that year BNP had no MP. As a political party in a Parliamentary democracy what BNP did, boycotting the election, can only be seen as ‘absolute political suicide’. However, since 2008 Awami League has been in power in which BNP has lost all its position and advantages as a Political Party and literally began to be ‘irrelevant’. Further, as a secular political party Awami League went ahead with claiming that secular identity for Baangaldesh meant that all these forces, that did not accept Baangaldesh found it naturally difficult to find ears any longer. BNP is part of these forces because it would not exist, if, it had not derived most of its membership and leaderships from all these obnoxious forces. And, despite maintaining a on the surface Pro-baangaldeshi nationalistic base-line-focus Ziaur Rahman took advantage of these forces and he allowed them to rise and get rehabilitated and, then, they were allowed to form and run illegal paramilitaries while he looked away all that came back to the public court and it was time to ‘pay’. The same tactics were much more vigorously followed by General Ershad’s regime and in this, these forces began to grow so violent and so strong that they threatened and, even, challenged the very Ershad regime’s political party and organisation as their illegal paramilitaries kept on slaughtering and dismembering, in the literal sense, endless flow of young and progressive students and student leaders across Baangladesh, as well as, of General Ershad’s student wing leaders. They developed their ‘campus cantonments’ in many parts of the country, such as, Chittagong, Sylhet and Raajshaahi and so on, where they maintained their paramilitary ‘troops’ while the government did nothing to challenge that.

Now, at this election BNP took part and there was this United Front, that all together achieved only seven seats, BNP having five. This is no wonder for in a Parliamentary democracy, if, a political party is not in the parliament it is out of the hub of politics and power. Four years is a terribly long time and a great deal of BNP leadership, including, Mrs Zia are serving various sentences for corruption and other charges so that the party was left to just wonder off and soon everything fell apart. Collecting some unknown and with hardly any grassroot organisation, reach and related organisational bodies to advance its message, only a few months before a Parliamentary election and hope to win a majority and form a government can not and does not happen, even, in political dreams!

At this election Awami League came back to power again on its fourth but the third consecutive term. Awami League has run the country, according to the electorate, good enough for them to re-elect it again. For this public judgement there are ample evidence to find support. One of the most fundamental things, that had changed Awami League for the better: that it had begun to be a learning party, seeking to administer the governing in a manner to suggest that they are learning all the time. This is why Awami League has done better than BNP in the ultimate test.

On this background Awami League has won this election. There were violence and bloodshed and accusations and recriminations and all these are concerning for in a democratic society there must not be lost a single soul and elections should take place as a routine and matter of course in this it would be hardly news that an election took place in peace! The most boring day for journalists on an election day in a democratic society is in this fact that they find no news to report: other than the most bland and most boring report: election held peacefully! But this is how democratic elections are fought. But these violence and loss of lives and injuries and all the related negativity can not be blamed and imposed on the ruling party alone on the background, that has been presented in this editorial. Any political party in a democracy must work within democratic practice, culture and the law of the land. In this all political parties hyped their entire mechanism and, this includes, Awami League and all its affiliated agencies so that things get to be violent and this arises out of the ‘impunity culture’, that historically went to crimes of political nature: this means that any violence and deaths through violent clashes and deaths occurring go nowhere: no one gets to be held to account for this. But the fact is this, Baangladesh has been shifted back to the beginning: back to secularism and the forces, that do not like secularism have put up a big fight for their very political existence and they have been losing grounds politically and they are at the end of their political life. There are other forces, who are secular and had much involvement in the liberation movement and the war and post-liberation era and, many leaders were in Awami League but they have fallen away from the current Awami League and they have no grassroots connection in order to win seats at parliamentary election. Not only that the forces, that they gather together are literally standing against the history’s direction: Baangladesh has redirected itself towards her original values, identities and vision from which no one can shift it away any longer. Further, Awami League has been able to gather together many other progressive forces with it so that they command a wider public support base in addition to their own long standing strong historic grassroots organisations. What is very likely to happen in the future in Baangladeshi politics is this: that other progressive and secular forces would find it necessary to become re-arranged and re-organised so that out of them new political parties will arise with secular and democratic values with younger generation leading these initiatives out of which new opposition party:parties will evolve, which will form the broad opposition to whatever the government party is but this has become irreversible in Baangladesh that both the ruling party and the opposition parties must subscribe to the baseline vision, values and identities of Baangladesh: secularism, social democracy, rule of law and world-facing outlook and an eternal war against corruption and lawlessness while keep on developing the country for the benefit of all its people. This is not a mean feat for a nation, that has, effectively, started its democratic path-building only in the 90s!

Awami League has done much for the country but we are not here to write a support cheque for Awami League but the fact that Baangladesh is an emerging democratic country, that has turned back to its origin: towards secularism and social democracy. In this the country has begun only in the 1990s. It has been hardly three decades. That is not long enough for a country and for a people to have it all absolutely set up and about: democracy is the hardest of all human constructions and it takes centuries to develop and keep on perfecting it. But what has been achieved so far in Baangladesh is astonishing in these three little decades: that the governments have been changed many a time not by the rogue will or violence of the guns of generals but by the will of the people and by now it is well established that the Armed forces can forget about it forever: they are not to run the country, ever. No General in Baangladesh will ever be able to just declare in the night that he had taken over Baangladesh. Awami League has much to do and much more to learn to solidify the state of Baangladesh and spend this term concentrating on the continual re-generation of the fabrics of the country’s identity while it keeps on being and advancing to continue to become a learning party and learning government.

Baangladesh is an emerging and growing democracy to which the world must show patience and support for building and strengthening a democratic culture, democratic institutions, separation of powers under the due process of law require continual works for centuries: Baangladesh’s democracy effectively began only in the 90s. Baangladesh must keep on enhancing and empowering the separation of powers by ensuring all three sections of powers: the executive, the legislature and the judiciary are absolutely independent of each other and in this the government must be bold and visionary and ensure that they learn from the world for the world is full of good examples to learn from. There can be no democracy when separation of powers fail to work. In this Baangladesh government must ensure a continual learning and development culture of all its branches: for the executive, the judiciary and the legislature. The parliament must ensure that it is a sovereign body and all its select committees are working well, learning well and taking the account of the government. The judiciary must be strengthened and enhanced and made as fearless as the Royal Baangla Tiger and no prime minister, no minister nor member of the executive should dare raise a finger to the judiciary. It must run by the due process and it must function as the highest possible apparatus of civilisation by the letters and spirits of the codified laws of Baangladesh. Just because it is Baanglaeshi judiciary must not mean that it is acceptable where it falls far short of the international standard. Sheikh Hasina Wazed has served Baangladesh long enough and will continue to do so but this term, we hope that she would look as a visionary and see what her legacy tasks are: that she must finish these tasks so that when she had left the political stage the state of Baangladesh is irreversible rooted in secularism, social democracy and the rule of law. Her primary task is to create a judiciary, that can sit among the assembly of the best judiciaries in the world, the best parliament in which it is a learning house, all its MPs are going through continual development and learning and using that skills and knowledge to ensure that they keep the government in check. That the Parliament has the best possible library, reference books and resources and funding and managing joint programmes with world’s many democracies and their parliaments for leaning and development for all branches of the state: the executive, the legislature and the judiciary.

Further, end all manners of corruption in all spheres of life. End corruption in all spheres because it is still rampant in Baangladesh. Modernise the law enforcement and create an independent police force and take inspiration from many countries in the world and set the Police Service away from the clasp of government and put it under an independent mechanism, overseen by the most powerful select committee of the Parliament so that they are free from executive influence and this is a must pre-requisite to build a society, that is run under the law. And lodge the largest and greatest political war against corruption in all spheres of life and society.

Work to take education further so that the young women, who have finished college let them go to University and have a degree free. That is the visionary revolution, that will transform Baangladesh forever. In this, enable all colleges across the country to become degree colleges endorsed by their local universities so that young girls and women can study for their degrees anywhere in the country and it means no new institution needs to be built, which is the biggest barrier in extending higher education.

Aspire to extend and establish a true universal healthcare from city to the smallest and most remote villages.

Aspire to establish pension for all and social security.

Regularise the economy so that there is not a single taaka unaccounted for so that the country’s government gets its benefits so that the people gets its benefit.

A housing revolution is required as a must and set a date to rehouse people perishing away into shanty towns. Aspire towards a milestone that within a decade all shanty towns would be replaced by modern dwellings, where human beings can live.

Employment creation and advancing rights of the people with disabilities and support for those who are long term ill. Create a Parliamentary Commission to look at, assess and recommend legislative changes to empower, enhance and enfranchise all minority communities and this is an absolute must and can not be let to be done tomorrow. 

There are thousand and millions of things Baangladesh can do but what it must not do is fall short on visions, dreams and courage to rise and reach the highest and seek and strive the hardest.

Most of all human rights are not something applicable to aliens from Mars: they apply to human beings and all these millions and millions of Baangladeshis are human beings and they have and they must have human rights. There is no democracy nor rule of law unless there are human rights.  

Release all the political prisoners forthwith and no one should dare put people in prisons because it serves the ruling party. This must end. Baangladesh must grow up and learn to do so fast: maturity is a must. It is paramount that the current government learns to mature up fast so that they stay in office with a democratic mind-frame, that says, there are laws and there is the judiciary: you can not put people in prison just because you are in government and you can do. No. this must end.

Further, no extra-judicial killing of any human being be let to go on unpunished. No crime must go unpunished. All deaths must be investigated and criminals brought to justice and ensure that corruption is dead and buried so that the dead can get justice as well as the living. The Government must not ever let any government law enforcement agencies running extra-judicial killing. No one must ever get killed extra-judicially.

Most importantly, there is neither social democracy nor justice in enhancing and distributing poverty: the development of the country must reach all portions and sections of Baangladesh and it must never be a country where the rich keep on getting richer and poor keeps on being walked over. Awami League has much to do, despite doing much.

But most of all, this editorial ends with this call to the Daughter of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, no one is more qualified to know this better than her, what it means to be ‘slaughtered’ along with those killed while one lives on to pay for the slaughter. They terminated her whole family. We touch on this simply to raise the inhumanity, brutality, barbarity and ferociousness of death sentence: death is no sentence. Death is the end of life. A sentence as a punishment can not but be one in which the criminal pays for the crime: by losing her:his liberty and with it, effectively, human life experience. Death sentence actually releases the criminal from paying for their crimes and, instead, this sentence is then involuntary given to those, who are related to the criminal: their family, friends and loved ones, who keep on paying the price of that state killing of human beings. We call on the Baangladesh Government to immediately declare a moratorium against death sentences and bring an end to death penalty all together, the quicker the better. End death penalty today. Death penalty is incompatible with the rule of law, democracy and anything, that can be mentioned with these concepts. Let Baangladesh rise to strive to reach the highest of realms of human existence. End death penalty. The Greeks told us this much: the difference between humanity and monstrosity is the rule of law: and no state acts within humanity and human values when they go about ‘killing’ human beings by the name of the law. This takes humanity’s home away and in that void of humanity monstrosity makes its bed.:::ω.

|| Readmore || 070119 || Up || 








Exiting the European Union: The Final Referendum: Membership of a Club Offers Advantages Benefits and Privileges to Its Members for a Membership Fee and a Commitment That All Members Will Always Abide by Its Rules and Regulations: Under No Circumstance A Member Leaving the Club Can Get a Better Deal with the Club Than Being a Member



|| November 28: 2018 || ά. This is logic. This is simply because the Club exists to offer these advantages, benefits and privileges to all its members; were it to offer a ‘better’ set of these advantages to non-members it disavows its core reason detour: to exist for the membership’s sole benefits. In other words, were the Club to do so, to act against its own members and to offer a better set of benefits to non-members, no one would remain in that Club nor would anyone want to join it, since, who would like to subscribe to be member of this Club and pay a big membership fee only to be offered a worse deal of benefits compared to what are offered to non-members, who do not pay that membership fee nor do they have to abide by the Club’s rules and regulations? In this, the Club has no attractions to attract new members and has all the reasons to lose all existing members and in this it acts against its own existence, which, it can not sustain because it has no means to achieve an income, since, it has lost or, will do, all its members. Furthermore, when such a Club offers a better set of benefits to non-members, who do not pay any membership fee, it does so with the membership’s ‘funds’, which are supposed to be used for the sole benefits of all members. This is the rudimentary, bare and simple truth, that is applicable to this whole sorry saga of the United Kingdom leaving the European Union. However, this truth has been missing from the public discourse ever since the European Referendum.

There have been all these conundrums about negotiating a deal with the European Union since the European Referendum but no one has presented to the country this rudimentary, bare and simple truth that the European Union, as a body of many nations, can not act against its own membership and, must, always, protect the interests of all its members. These two are the ‘determining’ and ‘absolute’ criteria for the Union. These, it can not but follow and, therefore, it can not negotiate a deal, harming its own membership, who pays substantial membership fees every year and are, thus, entitled to the set-out advantages, benefits and privileges. In other words, the European Union’s hands are ‘locked’ by these two determining and absolute criteria, that are non-negotiable. Here, then, United Kingdom goes to negotiate and what does it expect? It took the view that ‘No deal is better than a bad deal’, as the Prime Minister set it out. This statement is an absolute muddle: The Worst Deal is leaving the European Union as opposed to the Best Deal in staying in the European Union. The worse deal, therefore, is leaving the EU with ‘No deal’ and, any other possible deal, is not a bad one but just one bad one picked out of a whole lot of all possible bad deals with the EU for the only deal, that is the best deal, is only available to the EU members. Therefore, to suggest a No Deal is better than a bad one is absolutely wrong. But the UK went into the negotiation with this muddle and what did it expect?

Before we answer this question, let us see, how the UK enters this negotiation. The UK, as a state and government, has the same two determining and absolute criteria: to act protecting and not harming its membership or the people of this country. But this UK state and government were ‘imposed’ a ‘mandatory abandonment’ of these two determining and absolute criteria because the Referendum result, effectively, ‘dictated it’ to them that they can not but follow. And, therefore, the UK goes into the negotiation, having lost its two determining criteria and, thus, not acting to protect and not harm its own interest, which had already been done by the Referendum: it, simply and barely, tries to negotiate a deal from all the inferior positions left outside the membership of the EU and all these inferior deals are made of all possible worse deals for the UK. In this the UK has no true or real choice, which the Referendum result has taken away. This is, possibly, the most worst negotiating position imaginable: doing so not to choose but to get to a state whereby one simply says to oneself: all harm and hurt but this one does so a little easier and a little less for a little less longer than the others with a little less severity than the all others. 

So, what does the UK expect: That the European Union will abandon its Criteria: the Determining and Absolute ones: not to harm or act against its own membership. Were another country to leave the EU and the UK was in the EU, would it expect and accept that the EU was working against the membership’s interests, as well as, against the interests of the UK? It, absolutely, would not and should not and must not accept that. Therefore, the EU countries are not villains and bad neighbours for seeking to ensure that the negotiations ensure the best interests of the EU as a whole and for each and every EU member. Starting from here, it is prima facie a position that the UK was starting a negotiation position, where it does not decide the determining and absolute criteria nor can it or does it have any means to negotiate a deal, that harms the EU and all its members and only benefits the UK. Whatever deal the UK agrees with the EU can not but be, in all circumstances, a worse deal compared to the deal it gets being a member of the EU. No one, no government of the UK, whether the Conservatives or the Labour or any other coalition government, can negotiate any deal with the EU, that is a better deal for the UK than the deal it has with the EU as a member of this Union.

Now, any deal, therefore, is a far inferior deal than being a member so that the UK would seek to ‘minimise’ the ‘damage’ or ‘loss’ caused by its departure from the EU. Yet, here, again, logic: roughly speaking, the UK does about 48% of its total trade with this block of the economic and financial market of the EU. Now, it can not but accept that unless it negotiates a deal of any sort with the EU and ends up leaving with no deal, it loses this 48% of its trade with the EU. Now, let us look at what this translates as into the reality. The UK loses 48% of its trade and it has no other likely deal with the EU coming up any time soon in the future and, even, if, it does, trade deals are lengthy, complex and time consuming and they are done in years and not in days, weeks or months. In this period the UK has no trade with this giant of a single market. So, what does it do with this loss of 48% trade? Can it do this 48% trade with other countries? Well, the UK, must, first, negotiate a trade deal with these countries, one by one and, as trade deals go, they love procrastination: they take times in years. So, how does the UK fill this 48% gap in trade?

How does that impact the economy? If, this loss is not covered, which, we can see is not going to be covered by the UK in the short and medium term. Does this not mean that the economy can not but shrink by as much: it is possible for the UK to do micro-economic adjustments, which shall not do much in terms of changing the loss of the trade and works almost against it, in which, the output will slightly grow temporarily but the economy can not sell the extra output because it has no access to the lost 48% of the trading market. Further, despite micro-economic adjustments, the UK has hardly any power to do anything macro-economic so that it is left with the ‘mercy’ of the elements until the ‘python’ of the trade negotiations, reaches the end point to deliver a trade deal with one country at a time.

But a trade deal with India, for instance, is, almost, useless: for the UK can not sell nan breads in India because it would be suicidal for it because nan-bread is utterly cheap in India in relation to the UK cost of producing it. Most of the UK produce are useless in Indian market because India can sell them cheap, cheaper than any other supplier and when it can not do so it can import from other places, that can supply it equally cheap nan bread, unlike the UK. Compared to the EU a trade deal with India is utterly useless for the UK. A Car produced in UK costing £50,000 becomes a figure in Indian currency that goes beyond the buying power of the vast majority of Indians while they can buy an India car far cheaper than the UK ones!

And, let us now, translate this 48% loss of the trade, into the economy: despite all the predictions and guess works and scenario-juggling, the fact is this: unless the UK is able to fill this gap it is going to have to accept this 48% loss for the short and medium term, which will, slightly, be getting better in the longer term, even, than, the shrinkage of the economy will take generations of optimistic growth year on year to get back to the size, what and where it was when the UK was part of the EU; however, the scars will always remain there of the devastations inflicted by the departure. This means the parts of the economy, that produce most of its products and services for the European market have to reduce their production by as much. Meaning these sectors of the economy shall be mauled and devastated by these losses. They will shrink in size, they will reduce their investments and they will cut their work force and the rest follows. This, when applied, to the whole economy, the government revenue will go substantially down, it will cut in everything much more drastically, ruthlessly and severely and it does so to sustain and survive and it borrows too much with too high an interest rate and pays that off for far longer a time frame paying far too much in interests and it spends far too much to support the multitude of new caravan of unemployed from all sectors: the public, the private, the third sector and the army of self-employment. All these people will have to be supported by the social security, a gigantic cost to the economy or the country. Further, these people, have lost their earnings and now getting the bare, basic as support, so that they have got terribly little to spend in the economy, which, in turn, will shrink the inner economy of the UK much and that will, then, add further shrinkage and job losses into the economy. All that will devastate the housing market and all the elements in it.

This will spread in all sectors and this can only be catastrophic in terms of severity and magnitude. This is very likely to be worse than the impacts the financial crisis had inflicted on the UK economy. The signs of this catastrophe will be strewn all about by the  devastations it will unleash all across the landscape and everyone and everything shall be terribly negatively impacted: but as with the financial crash and what followed in the horrendous name of austerity, the poor, the working poor, the families with children, people with disabilities, the frail, the ill, the mentally ill and the elderly, the minorities, the women and, particularly, children, shall pay the most as they did following the financial crash. However, this time, they will pay far more for far longer and far worse and for generations. These are not scare mongering scenarios nor is it so-called ‘project fear’. This is project reason, this is project logic, this is project common sense: you stop breathing and it will cause physiological consequences onto the physiology. One stops eating and the consequences will follow. You put too much engine oil in the engine and it will have consequences or, if, you do not put the engine oil, it, too, will have dire consequences.

Therefore, on retrospect, since the Referendum, any rational and reasonable person, so long they have chosen to exist, live by and act and conduct themselves by the beautiful dictate of reason, rationality, logic, mathematics, science and evidence, can not but see that this is utter, absolute and sheer lunacy to get all excited and vote to leave the European Union. There is not a single reason for which the UK should leave the EU for however way it does it, it can not but get to a far inferior position compared to staying in as a member. But the political conundrum is this that the nation had been ‘bombarded’, ‘directed’, herded and manipulated with much from the dark forces, who gathered around the so-called nostalgic nationalists, who harbour a hidden-sense of longing and tinted romanticism for the far right but they are politically ‘conscious and aware’ not to speak about it as such so that they dog whistle and they know their audience will understand. These two forces, the leading one, the national nostalgic supremacy seekers and the wider segments and fragments of all the extreme right wing and horrible forces followed them and, in concert they went about campaigning for leaving the EU and joined them many other forces, that had their own agendas and all these created fog and haze while others went to campaigning for staying in and did a terribly poor job and the nation got all misled, offered untruths, falsehoods, fabrications, propaganda and gigantic lies offered as promises and many questionable sources made available millions and millions of pounds and the manipulation, directing and herding of the populace were unleashed for the leave campaign and, what was worse, the government and the conservative party split in two and the chaos ruled that campaign and the people, both voting for leaving and for remaining got ‘miss-sold’ terribly, terribly badly: but, this is true that however way it was achieved, a majority, albeit, very tiny one, voted to leave the EU. But this is the fact that this voting was an act of harming one’s own interest and abandoning one’s determining and absolute yardstick of always acting to protect and not harm one’s own interest. Leaving the EU the UK does that to itself in equal measure: it acts against its own interest and lets itself be harmed.

But, even, after that, no one has shown the country this bare fact that this leaving can not but be a catastrophe as stated at our opening paragraph. Leaving with no deal is the high catastrophe and leaving with any other type of deal as ‘best’of all worse possible worlds’ is going to be equally a catastrophe with only the imaginary life-line for all other possible trade deals with other countries but that will come too late with too little to rescue the UK gasping for air. In this, now, that the Conservative Government has got a deal and they are taking it to the Parliament, which, stands to reject it out right. Unless the Parliament does something to, specifically, reject a No-Deal exit of the UK, the UK stands to leave with no deal. This catastrophe can only be stopped by the country, the nation, the peoples of this country: England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales and the individuals, families, communities, the entire range of ‘agencies’, that enable and run the economy, all political parties and groups and unions etc, if, the Parliament forces the Government for another Final Referendum.

What is this Final Referendum is about and what choices it should put to the people:

A: UK to Leave the EU with a Deal Which Is In All Possible Scenarios Going to Be a Worse Deal Than Staying in as Member

B: The UK to Remain in the EU as It Is

C: The UK Must Not Leave the EU With a No-Deal, Which Is Worse Than Any Other Deal Negotiated for Leaving the EU Both of Which are Far Inferior Than Being a Member of the EU

Yes, the majority voted for leaving the EU and their verdict is not being disrespected in this Final Referendum. Retrospect or hindsight is a great thing, except, we do not get to benefit from it from where we stand at any point in our reality of the present and have to function and go on with life as best as we can. Since the Referendum much has happened and much have been made clear and clearer and much evidence has come about and much time has passed so that things are clearer to everyone, far more than the haze and clouds, that dominated the Referendum. And this Final Referendum offers the nation and every single person a say, again, for a Final Time: This leaving is a Catastrophe, which we do not have to go through: here, we have another chance to decide whether we still want to go through with this Catastrophe or to stop it all together. And, here, if, the voters to leave still feel voting the same way let them do so again. And, let the voters of remain vote the same way, if, they so feel inclined. Let the majority makes the decision, once again, for the Final Time, for we are not speaking of just ourselves, as this generation but speaking of our future generations and the entire well-being, safety, security and solidity of the entirety of the nations peopling this United Kingdom and all real people and families and communities and all that is for today, tomorrow and all tomorrows. This is how serious, profound and far-impacting a decision this is.

And, in this Final Referendum, out of the Three Questions, the first two decides on whether to Leave or Remain and the Second: An Absolute directive that a no-deal exiting the EU must not take place.

If, the Final Referendum votes for leaving and against a No-Deal exit the UK leaves with a deal. This means that there, must, follow a General Election, which all political parties fight with what kind of deal they would seek to get.

If, the Final Referendum votes to remain, the case is CLOSED forever. Following this, there, must be a General Election to begin again and start forgetting the nightmare of all these horrors, that paralysed the nation and wasted all national spirit and energy into this absolute negation of an idea of leaving the EU and clouded and muddied and darkened the socio-political, cultural and spiritual spheres and discourses. It is time the nation speaks for the Final Time and is offered a Final Lifeline to decide on as to how it goes about choosing the future and the destiny of the peoples of the United Kingdom. Let reason prevail and let us go forward with reason, common sense and sanity without the hollow, shallow and hostile attitude, mindset and direction.

Caption: The Pericles Humanity At The National Theatre.:::ω.

|| || 291118 || Up || 







For Clean Green Renewable and Sustainable Energy: A British Business Leadership Called Scottish Power GREEN: The Humanion Congratulates Its Visionary Leadership in Effectively Declaring Those Who Burry Their Heads in the Dirty Fossil Fuel are Minding Into Dinosaurs and Heading for Extinction












|| October 17: 2018 || ά. The first British Energy Company, Scottish Power has made the news by becoming the first of the large energy suppliers of the United Kingdom, that has effectively and successfully called it a day for dirty fossil energy. From now on Scottish Power to supply 100% energy from clean, green and sustainable sources. The Humanion would like to congratulate the visionary leadership of this company, that understood that the future is not in the grasp of those, who are seeking to ‘frack’ their way into profiteering without regards to what the cost is: fossil fuel is dead. DEAD. Those, who can not see few centimetres away and ahead into the future are still seeking to burry their heads into their ‘fracking away’ through the dirty fossil fuel mud are doing nothing but heading towards extinction. The green energy is not only sustainable and the future but, also, it has become the most competitive in prices. No one can beat clean and green energy now. Let the competition begin.

And, we are delighted that Scottish Power has started this revolution. Within the shortest possible time frame, not decades but years, the United Kingdom’s people will show where to direct their consumption of energy needs and the dinosaurs of the field will, unless, they wake up and stop wasting energy and resources and invest fast and hard into securing green energy, disappear into oblivion, regardless of their ‘mortal grasp on consumers through horrible tariffs and contracts. It is time the energy companies wake up and realise that Scottish Power has, in effect, declared that the GREEN REVOLUTION has effectively begun as of the day it declared going 100% Green, Sustainable and Renewable energy.

It is time the United Kingdom Government wakes up and abandon this ‘madness’ about fossil fuel and fracking destruction and nuclear energy and cease the opportunity to join in this revolution. And, to go with it, it is high time the United Kingdom Government invest in stopping diesel and patrol vehicles and usher in an era of ‘turbo-charging’ the electric vehicles and to support that public transports of all manners and forms, must be, revolutionised so that it is free for every citizen. If, they ask how is it going to be funded: simply, tell them, if, they did not know how to, they better make way for people, who can. Because it can be done and it must be done. It is time, it is high time to end this debacle of air pollution, literally, choking the nation. Let public transport be free for all and declare a war against fossil fuel transportations and begin the green electrification of all transport systems.:::ω.

|| Readmore || 181018 || Up || 






Advertise in The Humanion: In Any Other Valid Bona Fide Professional Transparent and Accountable News Media and Press Organisations Because You Create and Sustain Good Simply Because a Garden is Always Created But Weed Grows on Its Own and On the Way Destroys the Garden





|| July 31: 2018 || ά. The Humanion does not ‘publish’ any distorteddia-run advertising nor shall it ever do: because as a newspaper we would like to know who is advertising and who is paying for this advertisement, as well as, what is being advertised so that we have a say as to what is and is not let to advertise. For instance, if, someone or some agency pays to advertise for a ‘miracle’ cure for cancer, The Humanion has a say in it so that it shall reject that advertisement while, if, a community group seeking to advertise a community festival or empowerment programme The Humanion would offer them a discounted rate. Even, in advertisements, the news agency has an editorial role and duty to perform. Whereby, if, an agency, without any real existence, without an office and any location or member of staff, wants to advertise something or other, a responsible news media organisation will not give advertising space to such an entity. But in the distorteddia conglomerate anyone, who can pay, can and does advertise and people, without realising, keep on clicking and keep on making them money and keep on increasing their profits and the more they make the better their share prices get, by which they make a killing as well.

This way, these companies, despite the fact that they have a true worth of a fragment of what they claim to be worth, amass an enormous amount of money simply from the share market and their share price going up, which increases their ‘total worth’, even, to a higher height while their true worth remains as fragmentary as before. In this the entire ‘vasal-state’ by the rest of the world, we are using ‘vasal-state’ simply to show how the rest of the world appears to exist, as, if, simply to support these distorteddia conglomerate to make a killing by supporting, validating, promoting and free-advertising them and giving them ‘prestige’, ‘legitimacy’ and ‘authority and status’, by which the distorteddia get everything and everyone join its net so that they can catch and draw in the ‘money’ and in this the genuine news media agencies are being starved off and a whole lot of outlets have been disappearing and will continue to do so unless and until we wake up and seek to do something to reverse these  desperate harms most systemically done in the most dangerous way for without free, professional, valid, legitimate, transparent, accountable and verifiable press, media and investigative journalism, there can not possibly exist a democratic society for how do the people, the public, the individuals, the communities, the families and all other agencies to know what is happening in society and then make informed choices about the issues? These distorteddia have been let to weed out the garden and it has got to a desperate state and dangerously close to almost kill off the entire ‘free press and news media outlets’ through their profiteering and their support and letting the fake news and data manipulation and abuse and herding of the people and in manipulating the democratic debates and discourse and processes, as well as, the proper functioning of the judiciary.

And when we speak of the news media we must remember that they come in many different mediums: there are print and online-print media, there are radios and there are televisions and there are many outlets that are doing so online. And in them there are national and international newspapers and media agencies, there are national ones, there are supranational ones, there are regional ones, there are provincial ones and local ones and specialist ones and so on. Most of them have been disappearing and those, that are still struggling to survive are friendless for no one seems to take it on board that, democracy always relates to a state, that regulates the total ‘creative output’ of the nation and democracy is the means by which this regulation is to be done, then this state, this national creative output has a duty, job, obligation to do in order to have that ‘vital organ’ of that democracy supported: that vital organ is the bona fide media and press but it is not getting it now. It has been abandoned to the ‘wolves’. It is time this changes and a debate takes place as to whether it is time this state, from the local parish council to the largest of the government body, the central government, every single one has a duty and responsibility to ensure that national, international, regional, provincial and all local news and media outlets are supported not as a charity but the way a Parliament or Broadcasting Corporation or BBC or the Arts Council is supported by statutory means, from that ‘national creative outputs’ so that they remain effective and active and as vital organ of that democratic society and so that they can perform their roles and duties as part of the democratic system and culture.

For without the press the public and the communities will have all leaflets printed out and sent through them by post by various parties and groups, they will have all the manifestoes and programmes and no one will be any wiser as to what these are and why these are there and whether these are all made-up geese or real geese and they will have distorteddia assault added to it all and there is nothing else. There is no scrutiny, there is no debate, no public discourse, there is no way to investigate wrong doing, collusion, corruption, abuse of power and much more besides. It is time this debate begins and people in the media begin to join in this debate for this can not go on as this. It is time to stand up and fight back: The Criterion has been challenged and almost been devastated but the distorteddia has had its field day: no more: it is time the quality, the value, the good or The Criterion is brought back. That is verifiable, transparent, accountable, professional and bona fide journalism: it is done as a ‘public’ service as a ‘service’ to the people and to democracy and democratic society so that people are aware of the reality of a society and the issues, agendas and debates about all socio-political, socio-economic, socio-cultural, socio-artistic and socio-creative issues so that they can engage in the social, political, economic, cultural and artistic discourse and debate and make conscious and informed choices, without such ‘a vital organ’ of a democratic society, without that free press and media they can not do this.

Back to advertising: If, an agency, a business advertises directly with The Humanion we shall know who the agency is because they will have to pay for the advertisement to The Humanion and there is no other hiding place. There’s no ‘murky’ going on. The newspaper or radio or television taking advertisement does not and can not ever guarantee any number of ‘response’ for a particular advertisement but can only present it to an audience. A print newspaper, for example, prints an advertisement and the readers will read it or, they, may, choose to skip it but chances are that those, who were in need of this product or service will notice it. And this one particular reader, listener or viewer, may not, respond to this advertisement now but this is how it works: the Churchill’s Dog advertisement went on and on and on for years, on and on. This to-be-driver read, heard and viewed it and, yet, he did not even drive so he did not or could respond. But as soon as he had passed and got a car he could only remember the Churchill’s Dog and called their number and got an insurance from them.

This is olden days but these days things have become murky and fishy in every way and along the way the distorteddia has come about and the entire world got themselves tangled in their web and they have been making trillions of pounds and everyone ran to advertise with them so that they became the ‘landlords’ and everyone else became their ‘vassal’ ‘outlets’ vying for their ‘click-pennies’ while they made billions. This way the entire range of news media agencies, newspapers, radios and televisions all got devastated and no one sees anything wrong with it. The Financial Times, for example, is a bona fide newspaper and, if, it publishes a story on anything there is every evidence for the public to believe that that story to be true and it can be verified and, if, there is found to be any error, there is every chance and possibility that FT will correct it, particularly, if, it were shown to them. If, they advertise some product the readers will know that company A paid FT for that advertisement and not the ‘murky’ government of ‘Mr Novrosky’ or the others during an election time. Now, it is all in a mess and no one knows who is advertising whose products and who is paying and why are they paying and, yet, they all are making obscene amount of money for the distorteddia conglomerate.

This all has ensured that the phenomenon of fake news became an issue and it begun to devastate the entire democratic systems through its manipulative power and herded people towards directed outcomes at elections and many other public debates and discourse. It is time the world, the entire news media agencies of all types, print, online, of all types, radios and televisions, must work together and claim back their valid, legitimate and professional position and state in the democratic process and culture and demand that agencies, bodies, businesses and all manners of government bodies and public bodies advertise directly with them and support to strengthen the bona fide press and media agencies otherwise the entire distorteddia will keep on strangling the entire democratic society and democratic culture. It is time the news media agencies gather their strength and stop and demand that all agencies, that advertise to do so directly with the news media agencies they would like to advertise and not ‘waste’ their advertising budget to ‘fatten’ the distorteddia conglomerate and help ‘strangle’ the ‘vital democratic organ’ of a democratic society, which is the bona fide news media agencies, publications and organisations, that provide a ‘public service’ as a service to the public. There is no qualitative difference between the job The Guardian or The Financial Times or The Scotsman or The Economist or The Humanion provides to the public than any other public service: the youth centre provides a public service and the youth workers and youth work managers and those elected to lead and keep these workers and managers accountable will have no clue as to what’s happening across the country around youth work, the issues and the agenda and the debates and discourse going on until and unless they are aware of what have been published in these news publications, that would deal with these issues. Take them away and you are leaving the entire society in an imposed but deadly dangerous darkness and this is a scary and dangerous scenario, even, to imagine! 

Further, all the business agencies and many others, bodies, organisations, institutions, institutes, foundations, trusts, banks, universities and the rest must ask themselves how they use their multi-billion-pound annual advertising budgets? Do they keep on fattening the privately owned or even share-holding companies or do they use it to reach the same public but through the proper, professional, bona fide, transparent and accountable journalistic and news agencies and this way these agencies will not suffocate and get strangled towards the end for many would not be able to survive in the long run because it costs resources and money to have a professional journalistic staff to gather news, investigate and authenticate and finally write, edit and design and publish materials. It all costs money and advertising revenue is a major way to get that income. In spending their advertising budget each and every single business leader, every single corporate leadership, every single CEO, every single leadership of any and all agencies must become aware that the money they have to spend for advertising is a resource of this very society, a democratic society and the most fundamental, most vital and most paramount duty we all have is this: that we use every penny of that vital social resource to support, enable and enhance this very democratic society, which, we have shown, can not exist and function as a democratic society, if, there is no bona fide press and media.

And, they all have a duty, therefore, to ‘invest’ that advertising money with two aims: to get their services and products and company advertised but, at the same time, do so supporting that vital organ of a democratic society: the free and bona fide news media agencies and not to ‘fatten’ the distorteddia conglomerate. All these agencies must change and advertise with the news media agencies directly. And here the news media agencies must stop ‘collecting click-pennies’ and demand this change. Free Press and Independent news media agencies are no one’s ‘vasal’ and should get offended that they have to remain free and independent by collecting ‘click-pennies’ from ‘the landlord’ of the distorteddia jungle! It is time Tesco or Sainsburys or British Airways or Virgin Atlantic or all other similar agencies  advertises directly with The Guardian or The Economist or the Mirror or The Times or The Elleesium Radio or The Manchester Teleview or Whatever Is Printing Unprinted. It is time Virgin Media, Barclays Bank or Lloyds or all others This or the other, all businesses wake up and take up their social and community existence seriously. This editorial is the beginning of this shift: There can not but be a Criterion: Ours is a democratic society under the rule of law in reality where individuals, families, communities and agencies exist in a mutually and socially fostered ecology of common goodness, respect, honour and decency where we have a set, established, accepted and practised out criteria of behaving and conducting ourselves and the business of existing in a civic society. Every soul and every agency has a duty, has a job and has a choice in this to do the best to foster, support, nurture, empower and enhance this Criterion and The Humanion and Regine Humanics Foundation invite every soul and every agency to begin this new challenge to dehumanisation and distortification and being redirecting society, social intercourse, debates, discourse, exchanges and interchanges towards the empowerment of this very democratic society in reality, the individuals, the families, the communities and all agencies humaned, run and led by humanity, none which can be done, if, there is no free and independent and bona fide press and media present.

If, these communities, who advertise or rather who have these advertising budgets, who make decisions where and how or how much to advertise keep on following the same route and practices and keep on advertising and fattening the distorteddia conglomerate the future of the free press, media and journalism is going to be bleak and that bleakness will darken the democratic society and direct and dictate its demise into a jungle. And the distorteddia conglomerate will get the public speak Orwellian ‘duck speech’ and no one will know whether it is ‘duck speech’ or ckud screech’! This is where the choice resides: people, might, say, this is why The Humanion has no advertisement: well, we have taken a stand and we invite everyone to take a stand and let us make a start. As the headline of this piece says: you choose to create a garden the weed needs not any such work: it just grows and, for absolutely free, it eats away the garden. The entire democratic society, democratic culture and democratic debates, discourse and public education is under ‘terminal’ threat unless people, agencies and individuals make a choice, make a stand and do: support creating the garden so to ensure weed does not grow and kills off the garden all together.

And, to end this piece, this relates to the single reader, the one and the individual reader: this is where your choice matters: The Humanion is a daily newspaper ‘printed’ online but it is more than that: it aspires to be a twenty-four-seven eternal open and ongoing University of Life and the Universe: Our readers are eternal learners because they believe humanity, as we do, is an infinity unfolding itself and being part of that humanity we can not but be eternal learners and keep on learning. The Humanion is Free to read, that does not mean it can sustain itself without generating ‘financial’ resources because everything requires resources. If, it is free, ask yourself, will it remain in publication, if, it fails to achieve the resources it requires to sustain itself? The brutal truth is, it can not go on forever without the resources being found: And then what happens: it won’t be there and then there is no free for the Reader of The Humanion. So, it is free and, yet, it asks your support and you can pay for a voluntary subscription or make a voluntary contribution. This is a conscious decision, a conscious choice to do something: to support creating a garden and stopping the weed growing wild and eating away the garden. It is up to each one of us to make a choice, take a stand and do something: support creating a garden for this is the only way to stop weed eating everything away.

But The Humanion and Regine Humanics Foundation shall carry on going for the tiny little seed, that we had planted germinated and grew and braved through the stormy and troubled weathers and waters and it kept on growing and it is now a young little plant and it shall carry on going and growing and it will not cease until the landscape of today’s distorteddia dictation and strangulation of the free, independent and bona fide news media agencies and press are re-established and a change in the ecology in the business world, where business leaders will take more and more socially sustainable approach to how we do business and societies will accept that free and independent media and press are vital and fundamental part of a democratic society and governance system and culture and that society, that state, that governments of all layers have a duty, an obligation and an imperative to support, nurture and enhance this vital organ by allocating on the basis of a ‘statute’, a ‘fragment’ of that ‘national creative output’ we mentioned so that they can exist on a statutory basis and not as a charity case! And as part of that things will begin to change and in this each reader, each person, each individual, each agency, everyone has something to do: ask companies why they do not advertise in the press and media and why are they fattening the distorteddia? Why are they not advertising in Sussex Radio? Why have they stopped advertising in The Inverness Chronicle? Why did they stop advertising in The Highland Gazette? Every change begins as a nano-idea: this is the time to bring back The Criterion: it is time to take a stand and keep faith in humanity and keep on resolutely going forward. Regine Humanics Foundation and The Humanion shall keep on going and keep on speaking of the future not as dictated by the dehumanised distorteddia conglomerate but as seen from the viewpoint of humanity being an infinity unfolding itself. Keep on going for we are an infinity unfolding itself. :::ω.

: Regine Humanics Foundation and The Humanion invite all the fellow news, media and press outlets of the world, that  are committed to democracy, democratic society, democratic values and culture and in an independent, free and fearless press and media and in the power of knowledge, learning and human connections, interactions and empowerment through eternal learning but no other 'agency, body or publication', that are opposed to such ideas and ideals, in every country of the world to republish this editorial as it is published here without changing a ‘,’ of it, with the credit exactly as this and link to the address in which it has been published:

The Humanion Editorial: August 01: 2018: Leader Writer: Munayem Mayenin: Editor: The Humanion: London: England: United Kingdom: Advertise in The Humanion: In Any Other Valid Bona Fide Professional Transparent and Accountable News Media and Press Organisations Because You Create and Sustain Good Simply Because a Garden is Always Created But Weed Grows on Its Own and On the Way Destroys the Garden:

|| Readmore || ‽: 010818 || Up || 







The Two Entities That Have the True Constitutional Power to Give the Constitutional Authority to the UK Government are the Houses of Parliament and the People: Neither Has Given That Authority to the Conservative Party Government to Get the UK Crash Out of the European Union Without a Deal: Therefore It Shall Be Unconstitutional and Therefore the Government Can Not But and Must Go Back to the People for Whether They Want to Leave the EU Without a Deal or Not




|| July 25: 2018: || ά. Today both of the Houses of Parliament have had their last sessions of this sitting before rising for recess until Tuesday, September 04. All the peers and the MPs are now off to their summer holidays and there is the long and winding summer in which the country is left in a ‘white-paper-noise’ where the European Referendum keeps on brewing the same negativity and waste of all positive energy of all spheres. But one hopes that all the members of both of the Houses have set off their holidays realising that the tectonic plates of the UK landscapes spread inside each citizen of the country had been shifting all this time since the Referendum and has now reached a qualitative point of no-reversal: the House they are now leaving is not on the same earth as the people today and, thus, the people of the UK shall have their say and no politician has the power to stop this happening.

The tectonic plates have shifted and the groundwork got rearranged: it is abundantly clear that this government can not get its act together for they are unofficially two governments in an ‘agreed-hostility’, but it’s a terminal truce. This is why it is very likely that they will fail in getting to agree a deal with the European Union because they are unable to accept what they ‘can’ or ‘can not’ want because of their terminal division and they would rather have a no deal and crash out of the EU, yet, this crashing out is an outright and absolute disregard and abandonment of the duty, that a Government owes to its people, if, it calls itself a democratic one. Furthermore, what no one so far has postulated in clear terms: that a no deal break out of the EU would be clearly unconstitutional simply because the ‘constitutional authority’ in the UK law is derived from two sources: either the Parliament gives this authority by passing a law into the statute book so that the Government has the authority to do something as profound as Exiting the European Union or the people themselves give this authority directly through a Referendum or in a General Election.

In this current scenario the Parliament did not give any such consent for the Government to pursue a no deal crashing out and this Article Fifty Bill is nothing of that sort since it does not at all say that the Government could crash out of the EU, if, a deal is not agreed. Further, hypothetically, with the current arithmetic of the Houses, the Government is quite unable to pass any deal, if, it were able to negotiate one at all, pass through these Houses and in this case that deal is thrown out and then there is no deal and then what? But, most importantly, the other party, that has the authority to give that constitutional authority is the people, who did not give that authority either. The European Union Referendum merely asked the people whether they would like the UK to remain in the EU or leave. The majority, albeit, a tiny one, voted to leave but they did not clearly and surely vote to leave in which UK crashes out without a deal or with no deal. At a Court of Law it won’t require much of an argument to satisfy the Court to accept that that EU Referendum can not be taken as a mandate or authority given by the people to crash our of the EU in such an absolutely dangerous way, that will diminish the entire nation and impact seriously negatively on every single citizen of this country nor can it be difficult to establish at the same Court of Law that the Article Fifty legislation does not contain that authority given by the Parliament either to crash out of the EU with a No Deal.

It is utterly absurd to say that the ‘will of the people’ was this: that the government crashes out of the EU with a no-deal nightmare. The Government does not have that authority. The Parliament has, which has not given it and it is highly likely to not ever give it and the people have not given it; they said, yes, to leave the EU but no to crash out without  a deal because the people have not been asked that question yet. This means this: that there is either going to be some form of deal, which the Government can not get through Parliament or there is no deal: in either case: where does the country go: crash out! No, this, as we have postulated already, is clearly unconstitutional and can be challenged at the Court and, were such challenge to be made at the Court the UK Government can not do anything until the Court gives its verdict despite there being a date to depart the EU. Because UK Government is a Constitutional and Democratic Government and it can not act outside the Constitution, meaning without proper political process and authority, which for the major and vital decisions of national and international significance, come either from the Parliament or from the people directly.

Now, since both of the Houses of Parliament, the Upper House and the House of Commons are equally divided in favour of leaving the EU and in favour of not leaving and this divide has divided all the major parties: the Conservative Party, the Labour Party and all others and along with that the entire country has been divided in that two opposing types. And further to this division Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to remain while England and Wales voted to Leave. But what has been happening through the months since the Referendum is this that people have begun to realise and see the emergence of new body of evidence as to what it really meant and going to mean for the UK to leave the EU, as well as, showing how much complex this entire process is and how wide a spectrum of life and living are involved and impacted by the UK’s membership of the European Union and how far and wide this reaches and what a terrible nightmare it would be to find the UK crashed out of that body without a deal! In addition to all the propaganda, half-truths, full blown lies and fantastical claims about this, that and the other of the benefits of leaving, that influenced the Referendum outcome, are now seen in ‘cool’ heads; all this meant that the tectonic plates began to shift and now this has reached a qualitative juncture of no-reversal.

The Government can not follow the course they are desperately seeking and failing to follow. And because of this tectonic shift taking place there are voices, getting louder and stronger and more organised, unified and unison demanding that the people have their final say. There are many terms being used, a second referendum, a people’s vote, a final say or the other but what it ought to mean is this: that the government tried in this mess, that they had made and failed to do anything in order to reach a deal. They fail and they will fail but they do not have the authority to get the UK crash out of the EU: we repeat that the only two entities in the UK have this power alone: the Parliament and the people: the parliament is divided and unable to make a final call so there is the people: it is not a second referendum but the second part of the first one: which is, you wanted the UK to leave the EU: do you want the UK to leave the EU without a deal or you would rather stick with the EU. Then both the of the two groups of people, who voted for opposing side have the opportunity to say whether they wanted the UK to leave the EU without a deal or they would rather not leave at all.

There is no other constitutional way out of this conundrum, that the Conservative Party had created and in, by and for which they have been consumed in fighting between themselves and along the way the country has had no effective government since the Referendum but two camps fighting tooth and nail and running parallel governments frozen in and by their own agendas. It is time the Government gives up pretending and go back to the real ‘Sovereign’ of this United Kingdom, the people and let them give their Constitutional Consent and on that let the country go forward out of this frozen state of waste. It is time: now for the people to bring an end to this utter, absolute, pointless and tragic waste of national spirit, energy and creativity into all negativity. It is time to bring reason and rationality and let the people speak and decide.

This is the new shifted and rearranged tectonic plates of the UK today as the members of both Houses leave for their holidays. Back on Monday, September 03,  the United Kingdom and the people of this country will begin a new week in autumn and in that new landscape no more pushing and shouting and screaming and using emotive, explosive and expletive language: but the acceptance: it is time to let the people decide. :::ω.

||  || ‽: 260718 || Up || 









The Conservative Government: The Beginning of the End Has Begun: But the Country Must Demand a General Election



|| July 09: 2018 || ά. So, it has begun: the departures, one after the other, the Secretaries leaving their government as the Prime Minister Mrs Theresa May tries to brave it off despite the earth quake, that shakes the foundation of her government and her party’s base, as well as, shattering her already non-existent authority. She has appointed a replacement for Mr Davis Davies but another one went so that she found another ‘loyal’ to replace Mr Boris Johnson but she does not realise that her Party’s vital ‘officials’ are abandoning their posts one by one and soon it would begin a parade: a terminal mud slide.

How many is she going to replace? There are, surely, others, who will walk away. This is just the beginning: these faces are not alone and they are working in concert: the only person, who does not think this is the beginning of the end, is Mrs Theresa May. This is the beginning of the end of Mrs Theresa May’s premiership and with it her Conservative Government for whatever is to follo, it all can not but keep on adding to the desperate and irrevocable vacuum of authority of the Prime Minister, who can not remain in her post with that desperate state of diminished authority.

Whatever comes next, the Conservative Party will find itself with a new leader but this must bring an end to this Government. With the current desperate two-opposing party in the one Conservative Party, that new leader can not just simply form a new government because this will create the same paralysis of the last two years. The only way forward is for the country to go to a General Election and, instead of a second referendum or this or that vote about Exiting the European Union, let the parties fix their position as to where they stand and let them go to the people and let the people choose a government on their standing on this issue, as well as, other vital national issues so that without getting bogged down into the terminal waste of national energy and resources into a frozen territory of waste for years, there comes a new government, that has the mandate of the people as to what course to follow with regards to the European Union.

And in this the Conservative Party can not but officially get divided into two: one in favour of leaving the EU and the other on the not leaving. But in many ways, the last two years have shown this: that these two parts of the Conservative Party can not reconcile their positions; they have tried for many many years, particularly, the last two. And failed. But whatever they do is their party business but the country needs to go forward for the problems have been mounting high since over the last two years a frozen and paralysed government means that it did nothing to deal with and tackle these desperate problems, that the country is drowning in. There must be, after all these dramatic departures and positionings, headline making and manipulation of the airwaves and politicking, a new General Election, that can and will offer the country a clean and fresh break from the terrible waste of the last two years. There can not be a ‘replica’ Conservative Government to re-run the last two-years of mortal combat between two terminally opposed sides!

There must be a General Election and the sooner the better. All the political parties must ready themselves for a new General Election because the country has had enough of this grandest and saddest waste of national spirit, national resources and national sense of togetherness and purpose in something, that is utterly and completely a ‘negative exercise’ and in which everything is consumed while the people and country keep on suffering because the government is busy fighting with itself. The nation, the country and everything else, must resume life and business to run the country and deal with the issues and problems, that have been mounting. It is time for change: Time for a General Election. :::ω.

||  || ‽: 100718 || Up || 







The Hostile: The Horrid: The Aggressive: The Nasty: The Rotten: The Jingoistic Sociological Filth: Let the Windrush Generation's Despicable Maltreatment Be the Last and the End of All These Nastiness for United Kingdom Has Never Been and Shall Never Be Such a Nasty Place Because This Country is Peopled by a Combined Rainbow of Good Peoples



|| April 29: 2018 || ά. Yes, this image is of the Cheddar Man: 10,000 years ago he lived on these British Isles and, is it not awe inspiring that his living breathing blood lines still exist and live on these British isles and can testify how illuminating the light of science is: Where are We: Cheddar Man 10,000 Years Later You are Still Here in Great Britain: We Used to Call Her Dornuuarana. For where shall we begin? With the Romans? No, there were 'immigrants' or 'migrants' long before they arrived, who were, already, at home on these British isles because these are isles, being as such, they could not have sprung up and out with humanity on their heads! People had to come from other places to people these isles. Therefore, the entire United Kingdom is peopled by countless number of ever-flowing peoples, arriving and settling all along. So, where do we go? The Gits, the Danes? The Celts? The Angles? The Saxons? The Normans? Where do we end of this human migration bringing all manners of humanity to these isles? But, then, where and when do we stop? The Huguenots came, then came many others and then, when the British went around the globe bringing the entire world and world humanity with it so that the entire humanity arrived with their representations and contributions to these already blended peoples so we have the entire commonwealth nations and peoples represented in these peoples of these British isles.

But we would like to begin with the second world war: long before the Windrush Generation came after the war ended, they, these common wealth humanity fought and died along with the people of this country and got buried along the battlefields of the world without their names being printed on their graves like many Second World War soldiers. Many are simply there in a cemetery without any individuality for no one knows their names. These battlefields had the world and the United Kingdom peoples blended with their blood and sacrifice. Which nasty force would or could separate these and say these are souls perished in these battlefields, who were 'not white' and these are the ones, that were whites? For in that case, we demand that they show the colour of these souls! What colour is the human soul? Has anyone seen the colour of the human soul? Can anyone show the world the colour of the human soul:mind:brain:will? And, let them, then, connect the 'white ones' to the Cheddar Man; 10,000 years ago he was not white but following both the evolution of his genome and time in that time his descendents are now all white. But were some of his descendents to have been in some parts of Africa all these 10,000 years, they would have become as dark as the African humanity living in that part of Africa! This is what is called evolution and adaptation and change; because humanity is greatest at this power to evolve, to adapt, to change, it survived while many other similar species, quite like humans, perished away. Anyhow, then came the building and there arrived the Windrush generations from all over the Common Wealth nations and countries and they included all the souls, arriving from the Caribbean countries and these people, with their bare hands and toil and hard work, blood and sweat with all other peoples of these isles worked and reconstructed this country, that it is today. Let no one dare say this is not their country! Let no one dare say that being 'black' or 'brown' or 'yellow' or 'blue' or whatever else, they require anyone else's 'permission' to call these British isles their home for with everyone else they have  constructed this country from the ruin that it had become in the war!

Which nasty force would like to and can separate their work? From which motorway can they separate these people's contributions? From which bridge? From which railway network? From which road network? From which building? From which complexes and housing estate and telecommunications networks and other social, civic, community and public infrastructures? From education? From social services? From universities, schools, banks, law and legal architecture? Politics and governance? Engineering and construction, arts, literature, music and the list goes on. This is how this war torn country was rebuilt the way the very people fought and sacrificed their lives in the battlefields together the same very way they worked in a different kind of war of rebuilding the destroyed and devastated country and these people were not and have never been all inclusively white but they all were British and, that Britishness has never been and can not ever be established as being 'monolithic white' and used that as the basis of nationhood! Chadder Man, who existed, about ten thousand years ago, on these lands, has shattered this mythology, this falsification and this lie that British means white. What is the difference between Mrs Theresa May MP and Ms Dianne Abbott MP? What is the difference between Mr Boris Johnson MP and Mr David Lammy MP? What is the difference between Mr Sajid Javid MP and Mr Philip Hammond MP? What is the difference between Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, Ms Caroline Lucus MP and Ms Tulip Siddique MP? Neither person on each set of these names can tell the others that they alone are British and the others are not nor can either accepts that either needs the other's permission to call themselves British. But this 'colour' issue has been politicised regardless of the science and evidence while the plain truth is this that humanity is not the physiology in which it resides: humanity can not be seen or shown but can only be seen through their actions, interactions, connections, interconnectedness and creations. The human physiology is simply the 'jacket' of a home of physicality. The colour applies only to the jacket but not to the person, the human agency, the human mind, the human soul, the human brain, the human will, that resides inside that 'jacket'. For it does not have a colour nor does it have a shape. But this colour politics seeking to impose and lock people in the boxes of colours is utterly absurd but it is devastating the very social, cultural and spiritual cohesion of the socio-political spheres. This must come to an end. In this day in age, when humanity is poised towards reaching Mars and revisiting the Moon we ought to look further into millennia ahead.

 If, British means white, then the living breathing descendents of Cheddar Man living in Britain today, who are, at least, ones, who are known so far, appear as white as any other white persons, can not but be accused of either having done some 'dark magic' or done 'plastic surgery' to appear white while their genomic forebears appears anything but white! The misguided world view, twisted by geo-politics and many other absurdities seem utterly obsessed with physical appearances and, thus, with colours. People live on earth, which is the way it is, means humans living at various and varying parts of this earth will forever be physically different and they, forever, be evolving and changing and this change takes longer in genomic-level so that the physiology reflects the 'outcome' of the evolution in longer frame of time. Human physiology is the 'house' in which humanity exists, that does not have a shape or colour or physicality. That is what humanity is: its physiology is its 'jacket', that can not but change, if, it has to live in Siberia for generations or in the Horn of Africa or in Saudi Arabia or in the depth of China or on the height of the Tibetan or Mongolian mountains or in the spread of Europe or in varying diversity of Asia or Australasia. And, living in these differing places, if, humans do not and can not evolve, adapt and change so to enable them to carry on existing in these places, they will perish away. But we are forced and stuck on a cemented lie and this creates all horrors.

British people have always been a blend of all bloods and all genomic flow intermingling and forming a-new archaeology of humanity. This is the truth and this truth finds many enemies to dismantle it. That is how the Conservative Party could and did follow their path. People said and it was this very party that acknowledged that they had known the fact that people called them the nasty party. And in the last two governments one with the Lib-Dems and the later one by themselves, they set about this path of utter and absolute nastiness: hostile and horrid atmosphere for the 'migrants' and 'immigrants', except, who is not such in this country? Who is not a migrant or immigrant in the United Kingdom: the only difference is by how long a time? For some, this is thousands of years, for some others, a thousand years, for some five hundred years, for some a hundred, others, may be, decades: that is the difference of the British people being migrants. It depends when one's forebears arrived here. But 'when' does not change the truth: but the fact that they arrived here must not be forgotten! If, William the Conqueror arrived today he would be as much a migrant and immigrant as he was when he arrived and conquered England and built his 'empire'. In fact, if, he crosses into the UK today, the way he did than, he would be an illegal immigrant or illegal migrant! Yes, he conquered England but it was not his country, he came to it and, well, the rest is history. Except, we are a living history and this living history has been made into a terrible mess by this Conservative Government.

There have been, rightly, utter dismay, shock and disgust expressed since the horror stories of the horrendous treatment of the Windrush generations have begun to emerge and the degree and scale of 'persecution' of a 'section' of the very people of this state, this nation, this country conducted by its own government. But, so far, only, one voice, in the name of Mr David Lammy MP, has raised this issue but he did not go much deeper of the implications of this: that these people, the individuals and families violated by the government actions, were not 'immigrants', they were not 'migrants', they were, already, British citizens when they came to settle in the 'mainland' of the UK so that their residence status had changed from being British residing in the 'British territories' or the Common Wealth and into British now habitually residing in the 'mainland' Britain. That is the truth. Whether any particular individual among them or a great many of them have difficulty producing documents to prove that that was the case, they have been living here. Lack of 'evidence' or 'documents' does not, can not negate and take away their British citizenship! No government has any power to do that: this is against the very UK law and, most importantly, against the international law: no state or government can declare a section of its own people stateless. This Conservative Government has done precisely that. It has declared these people, who had problems with producing documents to prove that they have been living here, stateless! The cases, where people went to see family and friends in their place of origin, in the Caribbean and on return they were declared stateless and sent back to the place, that was not their 'political home': their political home was the United Kingdom, that refused them entry! That is illegal, that is against international law! So far, not many have elaborated on this most fundamental of all nastiness done against the Windrush generations. The United Nations should have all the reasons to open an investigation as to whether the actions of the Conservative Party Government was such a serious, profound and absolute violation of international law, by which the Government effectively, declared an absolute, vital and inalienable part of the British people, the Windrush generations, stateless and, consequence to that, followed an endless flow of devastating stories of suffering, agony and humiliation to all the individuals and families on either side of the divide: those, who are stuck here in the UK and those, who are stuck in the Caribbean countries.

Apology is not, ever, good enough to 'wipe out' the damage done by this unlawful act against the Windrush generations: that they have been made stateless, that their citizenship has been taken away and they, then, were treated as 'illegal immigrants' and hounded out and arrested and deported back to the places, that were not their countries: because their country has all along been the United Kingdom. This can not and must not be accepted that a government of the United Kingdom takes the view that it exists to inflict this much ignominy, suffering, humiliation and heartaches and all the rest, that follow them, against an absolute, vital and inalienable part of the British people! This is unacceptable and can not be let to go on. People are calling on this Home Secretary to resign, what she ought to have done long ago, but at the very last point of editing, we hear that she has resigned. But to be truthful, it is not just her mess! That mess began and gathered momentum under the than Home Secretary and now the Prime Minister Mrs Theresa May! She has been the architect of the 'horrid and hostile'. People can not forget her standing at the House and bragging about that horrid and hostile. It is time for the Conservative Party and its Government to accept that United Kingdom and the people of these isles are not as horrid and hostile as they tried so hard to prove: The Hostile: The Horrid: The Aggressive: The Nasty: The Rotten: The Jingoistic Sociological Filth: Let the Windrush Generation's Despicable Maltreatment Be the Last and the End of All These Nastiness for United Kingdom Has Never Been and Shall Never Be Such a Nasty Place Because This Country is Peopled by a Combined Rainbow of Good Peoples.

And, therefore, this ends with not apologies nor with a Home Secretary resigning but acceptance that the Government has acted against national and international laws and that it, must, without further waste of a single word come to the house and declare that all the people of this Windrush Generations, who have difficulties with documentations etc, must be, issued with a Passport, FREE OF CHARGE immediately and those, who were deported to, must, receive their Passports, as well as, expenses to return home. Further, every single person, who has suffered by this unlawful act, this violation, this horrid and nastiness from this Government, must, receive 'mandatory' compensation, meaning there has to be a law passed to ensure this terrible injustice is put right so that future governments do not dare do 'politics' with people's lives and act against the very nation and its people, they are supposed to work to support. The Parliament must rise to this challenge to ensure that this happens and that it happens not in the long and cold grass of out of site out of mind but quickly, effectively and efficiently and at the shortest possible time scale. And, each and every person, who suffered, must, receive a personal apology letter from whoever the Home Secretary and the Prime Minister at that point. People outside the United Kingdom must have been scratching their heads wondering and trying to answer this question: how COULD this happen in a country like the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland! But it has happened because this Conservative Government has told the country that this country and its people are:  The Hostile: The Horrid: The Aggressive: The Nasty: The Rotten: The Jingoistic Sociological Filth. And, let us end this editorial by saying this that the Conservative Party and its Government and anyone in them, who think this of the people of this country have no right to govern this country. United Kingdom is not Great Brain because it has nasty people with big mouths but it is great because it has great people, great humanity living and peopling it and who are capable of great actions and deeds and it is the saddest of all sadness that these astonishing people have been under this Conservative Party Government, that believes and acts as low as they have done against the Windrush Generations! The Parliament and all the political parties and everyone in society must stay on guard that this kind of utterly unacceptable violation done against the people by the very Government of this country never, ever, happens again. 

|| || ‽: 300418 || Up ||







Syria: They Have Been Slaughtering for Seven Years Anyway: Let Us Kill More and Open Up Endlessly More Killing Fields: Is This What Human Intelligence and Development Have Brought Humanity To: Move Away From Advancing Slaughter Fields: Enough



The World Needs End of All Wars and Not More Bombing in Syria: Humanity Needs Peace and the  End of All  Cruelties Imposed on the Vast Majority of Them Across the Globe: Syrians Need This Seven-Year-Slaughter to End and Not Lengthened by Further Bombing












The World Needs Food and Drink and Jobs and Homes and Education and End of All Cruelties Arising Out of All Manners Forms and Types of Poverty: Not More Wars and More Bombings and Killings: Syrians Need Their Nightmare to End Not Lengthened by More Bombings


















|| April 12: 2018 || ά. The war in Syria has been going on for the last seven years, in which, only, God knows, how many hundreds of thousands have been murdered and how many hundreds of thousands have been made disabled for life, how many thousands of babies and young children got buried in their dusty graves and in that time millions have been put and kept beneath the endless and ever-going and ever-growing merciless bombs, missiles, guns and bullets and, along with them, some use of chemical weapons as well and millions of Syrians have fled away from their birthplace and faced horrendous journeys across the earth, in which a great many of them are still stuck in refugee camps in horrible conditions across the world for whom a great many countries, including, some of the very ones, that are, seemingly, willing now to bomb Syria for the use of the chemical attack, closed their doors and borders! And throughout these seven horrendous and slaughtering years no one has done much, effective that is, to end this slaughter but, conveniently, however, many have got into bed with various players and many have been selling weapons to all sides and making obscene amount of money while at it.

And suddenly, again, chemical weapons have been used, which is most despicable and most abominable of all war crimes and crimes against humanity. But the fact is this: however way humanity is killed: the end is the same: their lives, to which they had a right to continue to exist, have been taken away from them: they have been slaughtered, murdered. It is, purely, academic as to how they were murdered: by bombs or guns or missiles or whatever else but the fact remains the same: they are murdered and they are dead and, a great many of those, who do not die but survive become disabled for life. The murder, the slaughter of the innocent human lives in Syria have been going on for the last seven years and those, who now can not wait to bomb Syria, have been in there: Russia has been there and so has there been America and the UK and France and many others in various ways and means and stages and periods, as well as, others, like Iran and Turkey to name a few more more. So many different players have been bombing Syria! And, readers, may, recall, in the UK, there was so much hyper-drama made about the last UK bombing of Syria, as, if, the very survival of the entire humanity depended on the UK bombing Syria! And what happened? Did any of it change a micro-dot of a thing in that nightmare of a place! Nothing! People do not, even, know how many different parties there are in that war and, those, who are fighting against that brutal Syrian regime as to who and what they are or what they stand for or fight for! And now they are at it again. To bomb Syria and what would that accomplish!

Leaving all others out, we speak of the United Kingdom, which is now led by a terribly weak Prime Minister, who has been floating from one disaster to another and now, who has, seemingly and suddenly, found her ‘Aladin’s Magic Carpet’. She has woken up back in time, in the nightmare of Mr Tony Blair and she has been making bravado about going to bomb Syria without Parliamentary approval. She thinks that this will help her revive her fortune! Yet, we invite people to think of Macbeth! There is no escaping the end: Macbeth faces a moving Forest of an Army and can not but fight his ‘last syllable of recorded time’. If, Mrs Theresa May has good advisors, it is time, they use their advice. This is the route towards utter ruin for her and her Party. Mr Tony Blair was much stronger, far, far, far stronger than she or her predecessor Mr David Cameron, ever, was or, even, ever, dream about being; even, he was done irrecoverably, terminally and done for eternity. Let her not fall into that nightmare and taking the UK and the world towards it as well.

Back away. Do not fall into the nightmare of Mr Tony Blair. He has never admitted it and he, may, never will but he is a human being and it is he, who had to live with all the blood and corpses since then and for the rest of his life he shall continue to live on his bed with all that blood and corpses as did Lady Macbeth. He had done two things in his life and existence: one part is made of all the greatest things, that he had, ever, been and done and the other getting with America into the War: the later has erased all the rest of what his existence stood for and, he can do nothing to undo what he had done. On the other hand, a Charles Kennedy, who had died, stood his ground and spoke at that gathering of millions of humanity and protested and condemned that war. Yes, he had a short life but served his country and people much better than many other leaders. And, his life shows us that there is, always, always, always, a choice and it is we, that have to make that choice.

Do not fall into that nightmare; do not drag the UK into this nightmare and push the world into an abyss of dangers and destructions, opening endless other routes and means to open new and innumerable killing fields in Syria. Move away! Or go to the Parliament and let the House decide. You are not the President of the United Kingdom but the Prime Minister of this country and this Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, a Parliamentary Democracy, must remain in office by and under the Scrutiny of the Parliament. Back away! Move away from this nightmare!

Bombing Syria is the most dreadful of all choices, which is a pseudo choice, available to the world and world leaders. This is the daftest idea, ever, produced because its rationale is this: They Have Been Slaughtering for Seven Years Anyway: Let’s Us Kill More and Open Endlessly More Killing Fields: Is This What Human Intelligence and Development Have Brought Humanity To: Move Away From Advancing Slaughter Fields. Enough! Turn away from this utterly absurd and comprehensibly flawed idea. This is not the way nor does it go anywhere near the way, that goes anywhere near the neighbourhood, that has a dictionary with the word ‘peace’ in it. Turn away! Move away! Get on with the task of running this country and fixing all the desperate states the people of this country have been suffering from and seek to pursue a course to bring this slaughtering war in Syria to an end!

The international community, all countries and the ones, that want to bomb Syria should and must get on with their own work. If, they can not unite in seeking to bring this nightmare and slaughter in Syria to an end they have no right to make things get, even, more dangerous and open up more killing fields to go for longer and slaughter more and more of the very humanity, existing and perishing and paying for this deadly and never-ending war in Syria. Russia is in the wrong side of history and humanity, as well as, against its own existence but so are many others. And America! Well, America is nowhere but LOST. America should find itself first before it goes about bombing other countries. Move away from taking the world to the gutter and open endless slaughter fields! Enough! Enough! Enough! ::: ω.

|| || ‽: 130418 ||
Up ||






Anti-Semitism: This Clear Unacceptable and Dangerous Political Vendetta Against the Labour Party Must Come to an End Because It is Harming the Wider Socio-Political Fight to End Anti-Semitism and All Forms of Hatred Prejudice Bias Bigotry Phobia Paranoia and Discrimination From the Entire Spectrum of Society Where There are Countless Other Obnoxious Agencies Seeking to Destroy What We Have Achieved So Far


|| April 09: 2018 || ά. 'Life is a colossus complexus', that can not be generalised in news headlines and catchphrases and characters. But we live in a world, that wants to stream roll anything, everything and everyone into a dangerously false black or white propaganda and, then, begin the 'bombardment' and comes to existence this bandwagon and people join and the entire social sphere becomes poisoned and poisonous and, soon, no one hears anyone or anything other than the abusive, hostile and all-negative goings on. Therefore, this editorial piece is going to be long and it will seek to bring out this 'colossus complexus' to light so that we try to aim for a sense of perspective, proportion and reality.

01: What the State and Government of Burma have been doing to the Rohingya people is abominable violations of not just humanity but the least of all human decencies and regard to the sanctity of life: But the State and Government of Burma are not and can not be treated as, if, these are Buddhists!

02: What the State of Syria and Government have been doing to their own people and to their entire 'infrastructure' of society has been a monstrosity imposed against their very own populace, which has been causing not just massive number of deaths but, also, making many countless people suffering many forms of disabilities while left unable to access much needed medical care, causing millions of human beings run for their lives and the slaughter still continues along with the repeated and criminal use of chemical weapons on civilian population. These are abominable crimes, regardless of the propaganda about all that 'terrorism and terrorists' etc 'mantra', against humanity and terrible expressions of the most flagrant disregard, contempt and loathing to the sanctity of life. But the State and Government of Syria can not be given the accolade that they are Islamic or Muslims. States or Governments can not and do not have faiths. Without people leading and running them they are nothing and they do not exist and can not exist. States and Governments, may, add the adjective Islamic or Christian or Jewish Republic or this or the others but the states or governments are not human beings and they do not have a claim nor can they claim to have a particular faith or religion.

03: In much of Latin America lives generally and human lives in particular, have lost all their 'worth', all their 'values' and violence, aggression and ferocity of weapons and guns arising out of the drug curtails, drug lords and the criminal worlds against whom the states and governments seem to have become helpless on-lookers. This does not make much news in the world media but it can not get any more desperate than how terrible it is out there. Now, these drug curtails, these gangs, these drug lords and the entire criminal worlds are made of human beings and they have or, at the least, they come from communities of people, who have faiths. Neither these states nor governments nor these drug curtails, gangs, groups and the criminal fraternities can claim or do have a claim to faiths: they are not 'people'; they are 'agencies', yes, made of people but without the people there is none and can not be any agency. Take all the human beings from a State and Government or any other agency and they cease to exist at the very moment humanity walks away from them. And, in America human life has hardly any meaning left, where the guns seem to have taken hold of the 'book of the sanctity of life' and this sanctity of life is desecrated on, almost, daily basis. But in this America is a state and government and, therefore, they can not claim a faith in this religion or that for they are agencies and not human beings.

04: In terms of the sheer amount of humanity China and India come to the top of the list of most populous nations on earth. And both countries as states and governments have such a diverse range of human beings living in them that they represent a great many faiths or religions, peoples and nations. But these religions are followed by people, human beings and neither the state and government of China nor the state and government of India have or can claim to have a 'religion' of their own. Agencies, institutions do not and can not have a religion because faith relates only to humans and to human individuals, who, then, form families, communities and they join societies.

05: What has been happening in Yemen is dreadful, dangerous and wanton devastation, destructions and slaughter of humanity because of politics, where Saudi Arabia is leading the war efforts supporting one group and fighting against the other. Saudi Arabia is a state and a government but what it has been doing in Yemen is, simply, grotesque violations of international and humanitarian laws. These state and government of Saudi Arabia do not and can not claim to be Muslim or Islamic, despite the people of the country and the people, who make and run the state and government. People have faiths agencies do not and can not.

06: There was the Roman Empire, where the Romans followed a succession of faiths and religions from their own brand of faiths to Judaism and Christianity and so on. The Roman people evolved into vary many modern segments of humanity and they still follow many faiths as their forebears but neither the Roman Empire nor its succeeding states and governments had or have or can claim to have religions or faiths.

07: Ironically, the Synagogue, the Church, the Mosque, the Mandir, the Pagoda, the Gurdwara and, the Temple for all other expressions of faiths, are the best examples of this point. Imagine, there is not a single individual human being, who goes to any of these Houses of Worship. Not a single person is involved in running these 'organisations'; not a single human being is there to open the door or close it when people leave. There is no human being there at all. Hypothetically, all these Houses of Worship will fall into disrepair and dilapidation and, eventually, become ruins and join the archaeological sites. Therefore, even, though, these Synagogues, Churches, Mosques, Mandirs, Pagodas, Gurdwaras and Temples are at the heart of each of these faiths, they do not and can not claim, without humanity establishing them, 'peopling' them, running, nurturing and caring for them that they themselves are Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh or Faith-bounds for all other faiths. Why not? Because they are just 'buildings' without humanity and buildings do not and can not have faiths or religions. And, here, readers can see and hear how ridiculous and absurd this sounds, when we come to say: buildings can not and do not have faiths or religions.

08: Hitler was supposed to be from 'Christian Faith', though, any Christian of any denomination would find it utterly absurd to suggest that he had any faith whatever so would most of the people of humanity agree with them. But he led the state and government of Germany to become high-crime-machines and committed not just most abominable, most evil and most dangerous crimes but, also, most vital for us to remember is the fact that despite anyone's efforts, that state and government of Germany under Hitler did not have a religion or faith but the people, who ran it did and they worked under the 'dictate' of Hitler and set about annihilating parts of the very German people, the Jewish people, but the Jewish people of Germany were German nationals, including, many other groups, that they did not think either German or, even, humans. States and governments do not, can not have religions. And, it is time, the political animals are put right, when they seek to put it in the public domain to serve their own agenda, own interest and own 'position' of power. They all use religions and faiths in advancing their cause of power and power manipulative agenda.

09: Now, Israel is a state and government. It was created in a way, unlike many other states of the world, for specific purpose to offer a 'sanctuary and home' to the persecuted Jewish people of the world to go and make a home there should they wish to do so. Many millions of Jewish people from across the earth from all the nations of earth, where there were Jewish people, went to settle in Israel. But this does not make the state of Israel and government into a 'human being', only, which entity is inherently capable of having a faith or religion. Further, the fact that the majority of Israeli citizens are of Jewish faith does not, should not and must not make the state and government of Israel the ‘speaking agencies’ for the entire Jewish people across the earth. Israel, the state and the government, must mind its own business and concentrate on its own citizens and must leave all the rest of the Jewish peoples of the earth, who are living in other valid, lawful and internationally recognised jurisdictions and they have their say there. And, yes, they are Jewish peoples for the Jewish population in Russia are Russian citizens and part of the Russian people, the Jewish population in America are part of the American people and so on.

The state and government of Israel are not human beings but agencies or bodies or organisations and without human beings running, leading and working for them these bodies do not and can not exist. Imagine, that all people involved in running the state and government of Israel walk out of them; stop working for them. What happens to these two bodies at that point? Suppose, one of us, went there to verify whether these two bodies still exist. But the problem would be that we won't find a soul to ask this question: does the state of Israel or its government exist at this moment after all humanity has walked out of them? There is no human being there to speak for these bodies and we shall have silence. There is no state of Israel nor government because they have no human involved in them. But in this situation, hypothetically, the state and government of Israel do not exist but we shall still find that all the people, who were living in that country, are still living there and they still have faith and religion and they still practise and live by Judaism, even, though, their state and government have ceased because all the humans walked out of them.

This means that not only the state and government of Israel can not and do not have faith or religion nor can they claim to be Jewish as shown on the above example, where, even, the very Synagogue, without humanity becomes nothing but a building and it is utter absurdity to allocate an adjective to building as Jewish Building but, also, this shows that as applicable to all states and governments, there are two things in this: there are the state and government of Israel in one side, which are bodies or agencies with no faith or religion and, on the other, the people of Israel, who are humans and can and do have faith, which is Judaism and these very people are and can truthfully claim to be Jewish people. And, despite people's membership to a state and, thus, to its government, these two entities remain different, whereby the former's existence is absolutely dependent on the involvement of the later while the later's existence is absolute. One joins a Book Club but the Book Club and this Member of that Club remain distinctly separate and exist as two different entities.

But many Israeli Governments from the past to the present, not all of them, some of whom pursued peace, seem to have tried to use and abuse this idea that Israeli state and government and the Jewish people are the one and the same thing! Jewish people existed, almost, two millennia, before the state and government of Israel, even, came into existence! Further, to this, they tried and they still try to portray, as, if, they have, somehow, got 'the heavenly right' to speak for the entire Jewish people on earth, which is utter and absolute absurdity for the Jewish people, who are not Israeli citizens live in all over the world and they are citizens of these states and countries, where they live. They do and will share a common bond of belonging to the same faith and same people but they are not Israeli citizens nor do they, can they expect Israel to 'speak' for them because they are citizens of other countries about whom no other states have any business to get involved!

This diaspora is a universal thing in human development: the German people in terms of their history not just live in Germany, though, the majority of them do, but can be found in many parts of the world; the French people do not just live in France but found in many jurisdictions; many Russians are found living in many other countries in the world so do many peoples of the world: Indians, Chinese and many others. The Baangla-speaking people live, primarily, in Baangladesh and in Posh-chim Bongo in India but in many other states of India and there are millions of the same Baangla-speaking people living across the earth. These are examples, where diaspora exists and it is not a political reality but a cultural, socio-spiritual bond among groups of the same people, who are politically scattered around the world. Take Baangladesh and Poshc-him Bongo as examples: these two political entities, one a state and the other a state of the state of India, where the majority of the Baangla-speaking people live. But they never have claimed nor can they claim the ‘heavenly right’ to speak for the Baangla-speaking people of the world, who live in many other jurisdictions and are subject to their laws and customs. No particular state or government has any right or claim to speak for the entire group of particular people of the earth simply for the basis that they have the large majority of their citizens belong to that group of people. The French Prime Minister has no say as to how the French-speaking Canadians live in Canada nor the German Chancellor has any say as to how the other German-speaking people live in other jurisdictions.

Like many other governments in the world, many but not all, Israeli governments have led nothing but efforts to create an utter mess for its people and crated a state of a 'perpetual ghetto of fear' for two distinct types of Jewish people, which we shall call the Greater Jewish People, as, if, they are 'the First Class citizens' and the Lesser Jewish People, 'the Second Class' citizens of the state of Israel. And who are these two kinds of Jewish people in Israel? The Greater Jewish people are the ones, who have settled in Israel long ago and have established themselves, through generational developmental route into 'comfortable' economic, political and socio-cultural life, where the Lesser Jewish people are the ones, who came to settle not long ago and the newly arrived and arriving Jewish population from other countries, who are sent to settle in the 'occupied territories', where Israeli government has established settlements, that are prohibited by the international laws, whereby, making them unlawful settlements.

And to call these occupied territories and unlawful settlement is simply a statement of fact as international law stands. Israel was created within a specific international border and within that the state and government of Israel is and shall always be 'lawful' as sanctioned by international laws and about this no rational human being can or will have anything to say but all the territories it, then went and got hold of by force of war are unlawfully occupied lands and building settlements there are unlawful settlements as per the international laws, norms, customs, precedents and conventions are concerned. Stating this does not, can not and must not make people, Anti-Jewish and Anti-Semitic or, even, anti Israel! If, Russian annexation of part of Ukraine is unlawful and against the international law and is condemned by the world, by the same standard and token, Israel's forced taking of lands, that did not belong to it, should be seen likewise. In condemning or criticising both the state and government of Russia and of Israel for this violation of international law is the same act of people's democratic and lawful right to demand the violations of international law must not be tolerated, accepted and they must be rectified by the international means and mechanism. And, this right to criticise and demand that all states and governments of the world abide by international law is the foundation of the very fragile and weak democratic culture, that we have going in the world; for all we have got is this poor little, fragile and weak thing! Without it the world will become a true jungle!

But, here the point is not the unlawfulness but the Lesser Jewish people, who are sent there to settle in that occupied territories. These places are 'war-zones' of hatred, where they must build their lives and faced all the 'threats, abuse and physical intimidation and all the negativity, that come with being in such a hostile place' and the perpetual fear of ones' lives and the fear of the lives of ones' loved ones! What a horrendous place for sending human beings, regardless of whether they are Jewish or any other group of humanity, to go and live there with their families and children! And these are the Lesser Jewish people the Israeli Government sends there to advance its failed and anti-evidence stance. This group of Israeli citizens do have a prima facie case to be answered in terms of International and Human Rights laws on the grounds that the State and Government of Israel are using and abusing their human rights by deliberately forcing them to live in such horrendous conditions! How can these people live a peaceful family life and have the dignity in that perpetual nightmare of an ecology dictating their existence!

Unless the State of Israel and its government go back to seek peace it will exist in this state of perpetual fear with two types of Jewish people in it: the Greater Jewish people, who are at the better end of society, where the Lesser Jewish people are treated as pawns and they suffer and exist suffering and add to this, this Lesser Jewish people are the most socio-economically desperate. There exists, desperate poverty, lack of provisions and terribly high unemployment and many other evils, that come with socio-economic deprivation. Therefore, the idea and the mythology that the state of Israel and, particularly, its current government try to portray that Israel is a 'heaven' on earth while the Palestinians are the 'hells angels' seeking to destroy it, is utter fabrication of the truth.

Palestinians are human beings and they have been wronged and their homes had been taken away from them and Israel want them to just sit there and die quietly while it applies all its might, all its force and all its resources against them, even, when they are simply protesting! And, since the Peace Accord, signed by the State of Israel through the rightful path of the peace process, that is now well dead and buried, establishing the Palestinian Authority with an agreed border, these Palestinians have faced nothing but a perpetual blockade or what the law enforcement of public order use the term, ‘Kettling’ people! These Palestinians have been blocked off from all sides, even, ther sea is locked off! On top of that whatever aid and support the world and world countries have been providing to help develop that Palestinian Authority has been literally destroyed over and over again by Israel so that that place within the territory of that Authority is simply a ruin and testament of on-going and perpetual destructions! Who would want to pour money into such a place to build things only for them to be destroyed and demolished by Israel again and again? And by doing this Israel is not just harming Palestinians but it is harming the very interest and well being of the Israeli people! The state and government of Israel have been pouring patrol on fire and then it tells Israeli citizens and the world that it can ‘demolish’ the Palestinians' rights by force! Yes, as we have said, the Palestinians are not helping themselves either but the forces in that people, who want to move with and towards peace, Israel had abandoned them so that the extreme ends of the political spectrum have been taking over and they are now at possession of the 'political narrative' there! Things are never black and white as propaganda wants people to believe.

Once, peace is broken there are two parties to it: the stronger broke the peace and that the weaker shall continue to seek to attack the stronger. And this process of perpetual animosity, hatred and hostility is a locked in mechanism of the breaking up of the peace. And until the parties accept that peace was broken, that involved two parties and these two parties must work together to 'rebuild and recreate that peace' once more. No one in the entire history of humanity has ever established peace by 'might and force and power'. Both the Israelis and the Palestinians must accept this truth. Israel shall never be in peace so long the Palestinians are left with no home of their own in that ‘kettled off hell’ within the Palestinian Authority and the Palestinians shall never find either peace or home, if, they fail to pursue peace and seek to create the condition to get the two sides at the table. Reason, rationality and common sense are enough but when do we humans follow reason, rationality and common sense!

Further to this, if, there is a blockage at an artery it can not be left there. So long it remains there the heart shall keep on suffering and shall continue to exist suffering and weakening in perpetual fear of 'ending' all together. Israel can not 'force' its way into peace while there remains the question of the Palestinians, who, are, on the exact opposite stance of the Israeli state and government and neither are right in their approaches. Both are utterly, absolutely and completely wrong: peace means it is created by the very parties, who had broken that peace together and, they keep on breaking that peace further and further everyday as they stay clear of that table of the peace process. This means until and unless visionary, courageous and humanistic leadership arises both in Israel and Palestine the world shall continue to see two peoples as mortally-locked adversaries carry on bleeding as they blame each others for their misery while the fact is like this: that the two people, who both have two knives stuck in their chests and they are locked in mortal combat, they both are hurting, bleeding and getting infected and wounds are deepening and festering but as they keep at the handles of their knives and keep twisting and seeking to go deeper or cut farther they keep adding fresh wounds and that is the way the state and government of Isreal and the leaderships of the Palestinians are locked in and both are seeking to justify their positions.

There is nothing to justify: you both destroyed the peace; who started it first is, really, a terribly academic question and, utterly, irrelevant now but it is the existential, moral, social, political, economical, cultural and spiritual duty, obligation and imperative for both the Israelis and the Palestinians to get back at the table and work to create that peace again for, the existence as Israeli citizens and as Palestinians living in the occupied territories are not natural human existence. They both, may, rise to the summit of Himalaya and shout that they are but the fact is that they both are living in perpetual hells, that they are making every day for each other. Humanity is not created to exist in this state of animosity, hatred, mistrust, distrust and fear, war and war-like state all the time. But Israel has the upper hand and it uses it as and how it likes and it does not like the world speaking up against it. There is one thing, that powers of the world do not like but this is the truth: no one can seek or claim justice with bloody hands! Israel can not, ever, achieve justice and peace with bloody hands, which it has got and the Palestinians as people, despite being wronged, have been led to have 'bloody' hands, too. No one can claim to get justice with bloody hands. Only, the ones, got bloody but still have clean and clear hands do and can go to the 'court' and claim justice and they shall get it. It is time these two parties rise to see the imperative of seeking peace for power, might, force shall get no one anywhere. Look at history and there are countless examples of this, that can form thousand volumes of an encyclopaedia!

And with this we have set out the first part of this editorial peace so that we can get to the second part. But politics goes on and politicking goes on and politics is a dangerously muddy and murky space, place and thing. There are forces involved in it ranging from dangerous to despicable, horrendous to obnoxious, from left to right to centre, centre right, left, left off centre, right and extreme right and far right and far left and extreme left and there are racists and xenophobes and there are anti and, you are welcome to add all the things you can think of: chances are they are anti, Semitic or Jewish people, muslims, christians, sikhs and buddhists and rastafarians, women and disable people and black and brown and blue and yellow and green and in this murky world of politics we now focus our light in the little arena of the United Kingdom, where a desperate but nasty miss-direction of energies and the utter mudslinging in the name of Jewish people are taking place, which is nothing but a misguided and political attempt to muddy the waters and all of this is terribly enjoyed and quietly supported and clapped by the right wing of politics.

All the laws in the United Kingdom, that relates to improving race relations, treatments of faiths and practice of religions and anything to advance rights of people, minorities and disabled people and woman's right etc have been enacted by the governments led by the Labour Party. And, yet, now there appear to be 'two types of Jewish people' in the UK: one is the 'mainstream' or 'all inclusive' Jewish people and the other group, well, they are not 'mainstream' or 'all inclusive' but the suggestion is that unless the mainstream certifies them, no body is or can be 'Jewish'! The question is who on earth has given this ‘power’ to this group to become ‘Custodian’ of all the Jewish people of the United Kingdom and they suddenly become ‘the Certifying Agency’ to issue certificates as to who is or is not Jewish or which agency should call itself Jewish or not! This should make every single Jewish person in the United Kingdom utterly and absolutely disgusted that they need anyone's permission to call themselves Jewish.

But this politics has got all the politicking in it and they are not attacking or channelling the energies to end Anti-Semitism and all its vile scourges from all spheres of society and they are leaving these out: the BNP and the English Defence League and Britain First and there are countless number of groups, that exist on clear, evident and declared platform of racism, fascism, xenophobia, Anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, misogyny, masochism and all-hatred, prejudice, bias and bigotry to all things ‘different’ small and unapproved’ by them. They have, instead, found the enemy of the Jewish people! Yes, it has been hiding right in front of everyone’s eyes: It is the Labour Party in general and absolutely in particular, its current leader! Attack, attack and keep attacking to kick this leader out and the Anti-Semitism in the UK is ended! This has been going on and on and it is time this ends!

To leaving all the raging and ready and fighting enemies of all human rights, civil liberties and democratic rights and anti-discrimination and advancing social cohesion this group is set against the Labour Party and its Leader for Anti-Semitism! The entire society is sunk in Anti-Semitism and all other hatred, that have been inflamed and made hundred times worse since the European Union Referendum and, yet, this attempt seems to have been acquired and taken on by the media bandwagon, that Anti-Semitism is in the Labour Party! And, add to this, anyone either as person or an agency, who criticise Israeli violations have begun to be equated to being Anti-Semitic!

This is a fact that all the non-christian faiths' houses of worship, including, the Synagogues, are always found to be left locked in the United Kingdom! Why is this? Why are all the churches always left open while the minority religious houses are kept locked? We go to all houses of worship as we pass by them on our walks. For decades, despite looking for, locating and seeking to just go in to just sit and contemplate, found not a single Synagogue kept unlocked! Not a single one! Always, when there is no 'service' going on, they are locked! Why is it? Why are they locked! This is how widespread the level of fear is in the UK among the parishioners of all minority faiths. Who caused this? Which political party? Which group or groups? Which government did this? No one did this in person or as persons or as agencies or as combined agencies. Society has done this! Anti-Semitism and all other hatred and prejudice and paranoia and phobias of all kinds and sorts exist in society and these are expressed everywhere. Did the Labour Party do this? Did Mr Jeremy Corbyn did this? But this 'war' against the Labour Party and its Leader Mr Jeremy Corbyn is drumming with political agenda of the vast range of the right wing spectrum of politics.

Anti-Semitism exists all across society and all spheres of existence across the world and it exists all-where across the United Kingdom and it exists in all political parties, including, all other agencies and organisations as much as it does in the wider society since all political parties  derive their members from this very society and their membership reflects that very society. Unless one is Jewish, people would not know but Anti-Semitism exists everywhere and it is rampant and it has been increasing and been validated and made to appear acceptable by the European Union Referendum and since that turning point. But it exists everywhere and it can not but exist in the Labour Party, as well, as much as it exists in all other such bodies, that exist in this society, a society, that is rampantly Anti-Semitic, Islamophobic and Xenophobic as well. And, in this, the UK is neither the large culprit nor the only society, that has widespread Anti-Semitism. In fact, Anti-Semitism exists across the earth in every state and country and realities are much much much worse in those places compared to the UK.

But this does not mean that everyone is Anti-Semitic in this country. There are vast majority of people in this country, who oppose these things but they are not making the news. And this fight of this 'All Inclusive' Jewish groups have identified the best course to advance the 'Jewish people's right to exist as they are and accepted as they are and let them practise their faith in peace and what is this course? Attack and keep on attacking the Labour Party and its Leader Mr Jeremy Corbyn! What has Mr Jeremy Corbyn done in, with and by his political life other than seeking to advance social cohesion, integration and civic society without discrimination, hatred, prejudice, bigotry and phobia etc but this movement is against this very figure Mr Jeremy Corbyn'! Why is it? Is it because he has led the Labour Party to the point, where it stands poised to get back to government?

In a democratic society, such as the United Kingdom, despite all the obnoxious political forces, there is a 'good' spectrum of political forces and parties, despite their different political philosophy and ideals, ranging from the Conservative Party to the Labour Party and the Green Party and the Liberal Democrats and the other democratic political parties in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and one thing unites them in one group, in the good spectrum, which is this that they all officially and unequivocally, as parties, stand opposed to all that sociological filth: racism, xenophobia, hatred, bigotry, bias, prejudice and discrimination etc. And, despite these, all of them have elements drawn from this very society, that are bringing in these negativity in these parties. And, they are and they must seek to clean that all up and the Labour Party is included in it and Mr Jeremy Corbyn has done, by far, the most, to clean the Labour Party of this scourge of Anti-Semitism. To end all hatred and to end Anti-Semitism all forces must join forces and work with these political parties and agencies, bringing in all faiths and no faith groups and communities to wider the coalition and continue the fight is the best possible political course society should take. Instead, these people have singled out the Labour Party and its leader! What kind of rationale is this! What kind of waste is this of human energy!

In this are involved so much mud, mudslinging and muddying that it has become a poisonous debacle in the entire social sphere and with it people with their own interest agenda are seeking to advance their own causes but what they are saying or claiming to do is the only thing they are harming the most. Anti-Semitism exists all across society and with all other hundreds of other obnoxious hatred and so on and by miss-directing this to the Labour Party and its leader is the utter sheer and absolute waste of the political force and this is harming the very fight, very socio-political fight we all must fight to eradicate all forms of hatred, prejudice and phobia from all spheres of society. And with this there appears some groups, who are asserting themselves as the certifying custodian of the Jewish people and all other agencies and everyone else must get their certificate to be 'Jewish'. That organisation is not Jewish according to them and, thus, if, Mr Jeremy Corbyn attends their meeting he is doing something 'Anti-Semitic'. This utter, sheer and absolute miss-direction, wastage and manipulation to advance some people’s and organisations’ own political agenda and political leanings must be rejected by all in the United Kingdom and to end Anti-Semitism and all other phobia and hatred all people of the United Kingdom, all groups, all faiths, all political parties and all agencies must work and unite together. This waste and miss-direction of public energy must end and must be rejected. It is time to challenge this waste of social and political energy and redirect it to the real fight: to end all hatred and all bias, bigotry, discrimination for good from all spheres of society and in this it is not the fight for the Jewish people alone in the UK: it is The Fight for the Soul of the United Kingdom and this soul is made of all peoples, all people, all faiths and all religions and all non-faith groups and all good people, forces and agencies and communities of this country. Therefore, back off you! The United Kingdom belongs not to you to dictate your ‘narrow’ agenda! If, you want to fight to end Anti-Semitism go and join the good people, good forces made of both the good people and good agencies of this country, who have been fighting all prejudice and hatred for centuries. It is time you back off and call it a day. ω.

|| ‽: 100418 || Up  ||


Editorials Published in the Year Gamma 2017-18 Editorial Arkive






























|| All copyrights @ The Humanion: London: England: United Kingdom || Contact: The Humanion: editor at || Regine Humanics Foundation Ltd: reginehumanics at || Editor: Munayem Mayenin || First Published: September 24: 2015 ||
|| Regine Humanics Foundation Ltd: A Human Enterprise: Registered as a Not For Profit Social Enterprise in England and Wales: Company No: 11346648 ||